UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

A longitudinal examination of the measurement equivalence of mental health assessments in two British birth cohorts

Ploubidis, GB; McElroy, E; Moreira, HC; (2019) A longitudinal examination of the measurement equivalence of mental health assessments in two British birth cohorts. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies , 10 (4) pp. 471-489. 10.1332/175795919x15683588979486. Green open access

[thumbnail of Accepted manuscript]
Preview
Text (Accepted manuscript)
Ploubidis_A longitudinal examination of the measurement equivalence of mental health assessments in two British birth cohorts_AAM.pdf

Download (590kB) | Preview

Abstract

Valid inference from the investigation of mental health relies – among others – on the assumption of no measurement error. However, it is well known that data from self-reported measures are likely to be biased by some process that is driven by the respondent’s personality and/or circumstances. We capitalised on data available in two nationally representative birth cohorts, the National Child Development Study (1958 birth cohort) and the 1970 British Cohort Study to formally test the longitudinal measurement equivalence of the nine-item version of the Malaise Inventory, a measure of psychological distress. The inclusion of identical assessments of mental health in adulthood in both cohorts allowed us to evaluate their measurement properties and investigate whether the passage of time has differentially affected the interpretation of mental health assessments. To do so, we employed methods within the generalised latent variable measurement modelling framework and related extensions for formally testing measurement invariance. We found that the passage of two decades and more in both cohorts have not influenced how participants respond to the short version of the Malaise Inventory. The observed scalar invariance of the short version of the Malaise Inventory implies that potential sources of bias such as age effects, survey design, period effects, or cohort specific effects did not influence the way participants in the two cohorts respond to the symptoms described in the Malaise Inventory. Our results offer some reassurance for the extent to which self-reported mental health survey questions are affected by systematic sources of error.

Type: Article
Title: A longitudinal examination of the measurement equivalence of mental health assessments in two British birth cohorts
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1332/175795919x15683588979486
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1332/175795919X15683588979486
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
Keywords: Malaise Inventory; longitudinal surveys; measurement error; measurement invariance; mental health; psychological distress
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education > UCL Institute of Education
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education > UCL Institute of Education > IOE - Social Research Institute
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10085057
Downloads since deposit
404Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item