Reimand, J; de Wilde, A; Teunissen, C; Zwan, M; Windhorst, A; Boellaard, R; Barkhof, F; ... Bouwman, F; + view all Reimand, J; de Wilde, A; Teunissen, C; Zwan, M; Windhorst, A; Boellaard, R; Barkhof, F; van der Flier, W; Scheltens, P; van Berckel, BNM; Ossenkoppele, R; Bouwman, F; - view fewer (2019) PET and CSF amyloid-β status are differently predicted by patient features: Information from discordant cases. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory: Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA.

Preview

Text Reimand - discordant PET and CSF - biorXiv version.pdf - Published Version Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Background Amyloid-β PET and CSF Aβ42 yield discordant results in 10-20% of patients, possibly providing unique information. Although the predictive power of demographic, clinical, genetic and imaging features for amyloid-positivity has previously been investigated, it is unknown whether these features differentially predict amyloid-β status based on PET or CSF, or whether this differs by disease stage. Methods We included 768 patients (subjective cognitive decline (SCD, n=194), mild cognitive impairment (MCI, n=127), dementia (AD and non-AD, n=447) with amyloid-β PET and CSF Aβ42 measurement within one year. 97(13%) patients had discordant PET/CSF amyloid-β status. We performed parallel random forest models predicting separately PET and CSF status using 17 patient features (demographics, APOE4 positivity, CSF (p)tau, cognitive performance, and MRI visual ratings) in the total patient group and stratified by syndrome diagnosis. Thereafter, we selected features with the highest variable importance measure (VIM) as input for logistic regression models, where amyloid status on either PET or CSF was predicted by (i) the selected patient feature, and (ii) the patient feature adjusted for the status of the other amyloid modality. Results APOE4, CSF tau and p-tau had highest VIM for PET and CSF in all groups. In the amyloid-adjusted logistic regression models, p-tau was a significant predictor for PET-amyloid in SCD (OR=1.02[1.01-1.04], pFDR=0.03), MCI (OR=1.05[1.02-1.07], pFDR<0.01) and dementia (OR=1.04[1.03-1.05], pFDR<0.001), but not for CSF-amyloid. APOE4 (OR=3.07[1.33-7.07], punc<0.01) was associated with CSF-amyloid in SCD, while it was only predictive for PET-amyloid in MCI (OR=9.44[2.93,30.39], pFDR<0.01). Worse MMSE scores (OR=1.21[1.03-1.41], punc=0.02) were associated to CSF-amyloid status in SCD, whereas worse memory (OR=1.17[1.05-1.31], pFDR=0.02) only predicted PET positivity in dementia. Conclusion Amyloid status based on either PET or CSF was predicted by different patient features and this varied by disease stage, suggesting that PET-CSF discordance yields unique information. The stronger associations of both APOE4 carriership and worse memory z-scores with CSF-amyloid in SCD suggests that CSF-amyloid is more sensitive early in the disease course. The higher predictive value of CSF p-tau for a positive PET scan suggests that PET is more specific to AD pathology. These findings can influence the choice between amyloid biomarkers in future studies or trials.

Download activity - last month

Export as JSONCSVXML

Download activity - last 12 months

Export as JSONCSVXML

Downloads by country - last 12 months

Export as JSONXMLCSV

Archive Staff Only

View Item