UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Perceived credibility of autistic witnesses and the effect of diagnostic information on credibility ratings

Maras, K; Crane, L; Walker, I; Memon, A; (2019) Perceived credibility of autistic witnesses and the effect of diagnostic information on credibility ratings. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders , 68 , Article 101442. 10.1016/j.rasd.2019.101442.

[img] Text
Crane_Credibility RHUL RASD Final Accepted Author Version.pdf - Accepted version
Access restricted to UCL open access staff until 6 March 2021.

Download (726kB)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: People with autism spectrum disorder (henceforth, autism) exhibit a number of atypical behaviours that may be relied upon by jurors when making judgements about their credibility as witnesses. The current study aimed to: (1) examine whether autistic witnesses were perceived as less credible than typically developing (TD) witnesses, irrespective of the number of correct details they reported; and (2) determine whether mock jurors’ credibility ratings of autistic witnesses improved if they were aware of their autism diagnoses and were provided with information about autism. // METHOD: One-hundred-and-twenty-five mock jurors rated the credibility of video testimony of 17 autistic and 17 TD witness participants recalling an event. Half of the juror participants were informed that some of the witnesses were autistic and were provided with information about autism; the other half received no information about witnesses’ diagnoses. // RESULTS: Contrary to predictions, autistic witnesses were seen to be as credible as TD witnesses when no information about their diagnosis was provided. However, when jurors were informed that a witness was autistic and were also provided with further information about autism, they were rated as slightly more credible than TD witnesses. Credibility ratings were only predicted by jurors’ prior knowledge/experience of autism when they were explicitly informed of witnesses’ autism diagnoses. // CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that disclosing one’s autism diagnosis (alongside further information about autism) may result in a positive bias in terms of witnesses’ perceived credibility. Implications for jury instructions and future research directions are discussed.

Type: Article
Title: Perceived credibility of autistic witnesses and the effect of diagnostic information on credibility ratings
DOI: 10.1016/j.rasd.2019.101442
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2019.101442
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
Keywords: autism spectrum disorder; witness; credibility; diagnosis disclosure; interviewing; jurors; perceptions; criminal justice
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education > UCL Institute of Education
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education > UCL Institute of Education > IOE - Psychology and Human Development
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10079593
Downloads since deposit
2Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item