UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap: Impact of drain free donor abdominal site on long term patient outcomes and duration of inpatient stay

Thacoor, A; Kanapathy, M; Torres-Grau, J; Chana, J; (2018) Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap: Impact of drain free donor abdominal site on long term patient outcomes and duration of inpatient stay. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery , 71 (8) pp. 1103-1107. 10.1016/j.bjps.2018.04.019. Green open access

[thumbnail of Kanapathy_AAM_Deep inferior epigastric perforator2.pdf]
Preview
Text
Kanapathy_AAM_Deep inferior epigastric perforator2.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (310kB) | Preview

Abstract

Background: The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is widely regarded as the Gold Standard in autologous breast reconstruction. Although drain-free abdominoplasty is performed in many centres, there is a paucity of evidence comparing outcomes when applied to DIEP breast reconstruction. Method: A retrospective review of patients who underwent DIEP breast reconstruction without abdominal drain insertion at Royal Free Hospital between Jan 2012-Nov 2016 was undertaken. Results were compared to previously published data from our centre on patients undergoing DIEP breast reconstruction with abdominal drains between Jan 2011-Jul 2012. Results: Thirty-five patients underwent abdominal drain-free reconstruction (GroupA). Of 74 patients who previously underwent reconstruction with abdominal drains, 33 patients underwent drain removal by postoperative day (POD)3 regardless of output (GroupB) and 41 underwent drain removal after POD3 following instructions on drainage volume/24 h (GroupC). There was no significant difference in the length of stay between patients in Group A and B (3.6 vs. 3.9 days; p = 0.204). Length of stay in Group C was significantly higher than Group A and B (p = 0.001, p = 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in total (11.43% vs. 12.12% vs 17.07%, p = 0.780) or specific complications: Seroma: 2.86% vs. 0% vs. 4.88% (p = 0.774); Wound dehiscence: 8.57% vs. 9.09% vs. 4.88% (p = 0.728); Haematoma: 0% vs. 3.00% vs. 7.32% (p = 0.316) between Groups A, B and C, respectively. Conclusion: Our data suggests that drain-free abdominal closure in DIEP reconstruction can be safely achieved without increased postoperative complications. These conclusions support existing evidence on the use of a drain-free approach in cosmetic abdominoplasty.

Type: Article
Title: Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap: Impact of drain free donor abdominal site on long term patient outcomes and duration of inpatient stay
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2018.04.019
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2018.04.019
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
Keywords: DIEP, Abdominoplasty, Drain, Seroma, Haematoma, Dehiscence
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences > Div of Surgery and Interventional Sci
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10079050
Downloads since deposit
0Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item