UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Assessing evidence of interventions addressing inequity among migrant populations: a two-stage systematic review

Yadee, J; Bangpan, M; Thavorn, K; Welch, V; Tugwell, P; Chaiyakunapruk, N; (2019) Assessing evidence of interventions addressing inequity among migrant populations: a two-stage systematic review. International Journal for Equity in Health , 18 , Article 64. 10.1186/s12939-019-0970-x. Green open access

[thumbnail of s12939-019-0970-x.pdf]
Preview
Text
s12939-019-0970-x.pdf - Published Version

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Background: Everyone has the right to achieve the standard of health and well-being. Migrants are considered as vulnerable populations due to the lack of access to health services and financial protection in health. Several interventions have been developed to improve migrant population health, but little is known about whether these interventions have considered the issue of equity as part of their outcome measurement. Objective: To assess the evidence of health interventions in addressing inequity among migrants. Methods: We adopted a two-stage searching approach to ensure the feasibility of this review. First, reviews of interventions for migrants were searched from five databases: PubMed, Cochrane, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and EMBASE until June 2017. Second, full articles included in the identified reviews were retrieved. Primary studies included in the identified reviews were then evaluated as to whether they met the following criteria: experimental studies which include equity aspects as part of their outcome measurement, based on equity attributes defined by PROGRESS-Plus factors (place of residence, race/ethnicity, occupation, gender, religion, education, socio-economic status, social capital, and others). We analysed the information extracted from the selected articles based on the PRISMA-Equity guidelines and the PROGRESSPlus factors. Results: Forty-nine reviews involving 1145 primary studies met the first-stage inclusion criteria. After exclusion of 764 studies, the remaining 381 experimental studies were assessed. Thirteen out of 381 experimental studies (3.41%) were found to include equity attributes as part of their outcome measurement. However, although some associations were found none of the included studies demonstrated the effect of the intervention on reducing inequity. All studies were conducted in high-income countries. The interventions included individual directed, community education and peer navigator-related interventions. Conclusions: Current evidence reveals that there is a paucity of studies assessing equity attributes of health interventions developed for migrant populations. This indicates that equity has not been receiving attention in these studies of migrant populations. More attention to equity-focused outcome assessment is needed to help policy-makers to consider all relevant outcomes for sound decision making concerning migrants.

Type: Article
Title: Assessing evidence of interventions addressing inequity among migrant populations: a two-stage systematic review
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1186/s12939-019-0970-x
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-0970-x
Language: English
Additional information: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Keywords: Science & Technology, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Public, Environmental & Occupational Health, Migrant, Health, Intervention, Equity, RANDOMIZED-TRIAL, HEALTH, IMMIGRANTS, PREVENTION, AMERICANS, EDUCATION, LANGUAGE, BARRIERS, EQUITY
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education > UCL Institute of Education
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education > UCL Institute of Education > IOE - Social Research Institute
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10075614
Downloads since deposit
77Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item