UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

'Very difficult for an ordinary guy': Factors influencing the quality of treatment decision-making amongst men diagnosed with localised and locally advanced prostate cancer: Findings from a UK-wide mixed methods study

Wagland, R; Nayoan, J; Matheson, L; Rivas, C; Brett, J; Downing, A; Wilding, S; ... Watson, E; + view all (2019) 'Very difficult for an ordinary guy': Factors influencing the quality of treatment decision-making amongst men diagnosed with localised and locally advanced prostate cancer: Findings from a UK-wide mixed methods study. Patient Education and Counseling , 102 (4) pp. 797-803. 10.1016/j.pec.2018.12.004. Green open access

[thumbnail of Rivas_'Very difficult for an ordinary guy'_AAM.pdf]
Preview
Text
Rivas_'Very difficult for an ordinary guy'_AAM.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (914kB) | Preview

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To explore experiences of treatment decision-making (TDM) amongst men diagnosed with stage 1–3 prostate cancer. METHODS: Mixed-methods study incorporating UK-wide cross-sectional postal survey of men 18–42 months post-diagnosis and semi-structured interviews with a subsample (n = 97), including men who received both radical treatments and active surveillance. Interview data was analysed using a Framework approach. RESULTS: Within the context of TDM, 'drivers' included men's intra-personal preferences for decision-making responsibility or clinical direction, relative treatment intrusiveness or desire for excision, and work, personal and social life priorities; 'facilitators' were inter-personal mechanisms such as information and communication with clinicians to enact, but also sometimes challenge drivers. Drivers and facilitators can conflict, challenging patient empowerment. Men frequently undertook greater TDM responsibility than desired, without clinical recommendations; others received conflicting recommendations. Information on potential side-effects was often reportedly inadequate. Unchallenged preferences, absence of clinical recommendations and inadequate preparation for side-effects sometimes led to decision regret. CONCLUSIONS: Men are not empowered when expected to take more TDM responsibility than desired, when provided with conflicting recommendations, or when their potentially inappropriate preferences are unchallenged. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: TDM should involve men exercising preferences and priorities in discussion with clinicians. Clinicians should ensure patients do not receive conflicting recommendations.

Type: Article
Title: 'Very difficult for an ordinary guy': Factors influencing the quality of treatment decision-making amongst men diagnosed with localised and locally advanced prostate cancer: Findings from a UK-wide mixed methods study
Location: Ireland
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.12.004
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2018.12.004
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
Keywords: Prostate cancer, Patient empowerment, Treatment decision-making, Patient-reported outcomes
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education > UCL Institute of Education
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education > UCL Institute of Education > IOE - Social Research Institute
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10067639
Downloads since deposit
65Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item