UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Comparison of gefitinib, erlotinib and afatinib in non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis

Yang, Z; Hackshaw, A; Feng, Q; Fu, X; Zhang, Y; Mao, C; Tang, J; (2017) Comparison of gefitinib, erlotinib and afatinib in non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Cancer , 140 (12) pp. 2805-2819. 10.1002/ijc.30691. Green open access

[thumbnail of Hackshaw_Yang et al Comparison of gefitinib Int J Cancer 2017.pdf]
Preview
Text
Hackshaw_Yang et al Comparison of gefitinib Int J Cancer 2017.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (556kB) | Preview

Abstract

Gefitinib, erlotinib and afatinib are three widely used epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR TKIs) for treating advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with proven efficacy. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesize existing studies with direct comparisons of EGFR TKIs in NSCLC in terms of both efficacy and safety. Eight randomized trials and 82 cohort studies with a total of 17,621 patients were included for analysis. Gefitinib and erlotinib demonstrated comparable effects on progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.95 to 1.04), overall survival (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.93 to 1.06), overall response rate (risk ratio [RR], 1.05; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.11), and disease control rate (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.01), which did not vary considerably with EGFR mutation status, ethnicity, line of treatment, and baseline brain metastasis status. Gefitinib was associated with more grade 3/4 liver dysfunction, but tended to cause lower rates of dose reduction, treatment discontinuation, total grade 3/4 adverse events (RR, 0.78; 95% CI 0.65 to 0.94), and a number of specific adverse events such as rash and diarrhea. No solid evidence was found that afatinib had greater efficacy than gefitinib or erlotinib in first-line treatment of EGFR-mutant NSCLC. However, afatinib was more effective than erlotinib as second-line treatment of patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma. The grade 3/4 adverse events rate of afatinib was comparable to that of erlotinib but higher than that of gefitinib.

Type: Article
Title: Comparison of gefitinib, erlotinib and afatinib in non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis
Location: United States
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.30691
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.30691
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
Keywords: afatinib, erlotinib, gefitinib, meta-analysis, non-small cell lung cancer, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Diarrhea, Disease-Free Survival, Erlotinib Hydrochloride, Exanthema, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Mutation, Outcome Assessment (Health Care), Proportional Hazards Models, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Quinazolines, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences > Cancer Institute
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences > Cancer Institute > CRUK Cancer Trials Centre
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10062664
Downloads since deposit
435Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item