UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Measuring Fatigue Using the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20: A Questionable Factor Structure in Haemodialysis Patients

Chilcot, J; Guirguis, A; Friedli, K; Almond, M; Davenport, A; Day, C; Wellsted, D; (2017) Measuring Fatigue Using the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20: A Questionable Factor Structure in Haemodialysis Patients. Nephron , 136 (2) pp. 121-126. 10.1159/000458770. Green open access

[thumbnail of Davenport_Measuring Fatigue Using the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20. A Questionable Factor Structure in Haemodialysis Patients_AAM.pdf]
Preview
Text
Davenport_Measuring Fatigue Using the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20. A Questionable Factor Structure in Haemodialysis Patients_AAM.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (273kB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Fatigue is recognised as a common and burdensome symptom among dialysis patients. A growing body of research is devoted to understanding fatigue in advanced kidney disease, yet its measurement is challenging within this context. Our aim was to evaluate the factor structure underlying the multidimensional fatigue inventory (MFI-20) and to examine its associations with clinical factors and mood. METHODS: Data was evaluated for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) from the screening phase of a multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial of sertraline in haemodialysis (HD) patients. Four hundred seventy patients completed the MFI-20, which purports to measure 5 components of fatigue (general fatigue, mental fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced motivation and reduced activity). CFA models were evaluated in MPlus 7.3 using the robust maximum likelihood (MLR) estimation. RESULTS: The evaluation of the original 5 factors revealed low internal reliability for the general factor and reduced activity, and high intercorrelations between all sum scores. CFA revealed poor model fit for the original 5-factor MFI-20 model (confirmatory fit index = 0.738; Tucker-Lewis index = 0.689; root mean squared error of approximation = 0.101). Alternative models, including 1, 3 and bi-factor models all demonstrated poor fit to the data. No reliable factor model was confirmed prohibiting the examination of factors associated with fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: We were not able to confirm the factor structure of the MFI-20 in a large sample of HD patients. Certain items may lack suitable face validity in this context.

Type: Article
Title: Measuring Fatigue Using the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20: A Questionable Factor Structure in Haemodialysis Patients
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1159/000458770
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1159/000458770
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
Keywords: Fatigue, Confirmatory factor analysis, Haemodialysis, Kidney disease, Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory, Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences > Div of Medicine
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10060852
Downloads since deposit
288Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item