UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Relapse of Wilms' Tumour and Detection Methods: a Retrospective Analysis of the 2001 Renal Tumour Study Group-international Society of Paediatric Oncology Wilms' Tumour Protocol Database

Brok, J; Lopez-Yurda, M; Tinteren, HV; Treger, TD; Furtwaengler, R; Graf, N; Bergeron, C; ... Spreafico, F; + view all (2018) Relapse of Wilms' Tumour and Detection Methods: a Retrospective Analysis of the 2001 Renal Tumour Study Group-international Society of Paediatric Oncology Wilms' Tumour Protocol Database. The Lancet Oncology , 19 (8) pp. 1072-1081. 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30293-6. Green open access

[img]
Preview
Text
Pritchard-Jones_LANCET ONCOL clean article 28-2-18.pdf - Accepted version

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Wilms' tumour is the most common renal cancer in childhood and about 15% of patients will relapse. There is scarce evidence about optimal surveillance schedules and methods for detection of tumour relapse after therapy. METHODS: The Renal Tumour Study Group–International Society of Paediatric Oncology (RTSG–SIOP) Wilms' tumour 2001 trial and study is an international, multicentre, prospective registration, biological study with an embedded randomised clinical trial for children with renal tumours aged between 6 months and 18 years. The study covers 243 different centres in 27 countries grouped into five consortia. The current protocol of SIOP surveillance for Wilms' tumour recommends that abdominal ultrasound and chest x-ray should be done every 3 months for the first 2 years after treatment and be repeated every 4–6 months in the third and fourth year and annually in the fifth year. In this retrospective cohort study of the protocol database, we analysed data from participating institutions on timing, anatomical site, and mode of detection of all first relapses of Wilms' tumour. The primary outcomes were how relapse of Wilms' tumour was detected (ie, at or between scheduled surveillance and with or without clinical symptoms, scan modality, and physical examination) and to estimate the number of scans needed to capture one subclinical relapse. The RTSG–SIOP study is registered with Eudra-CT, number 2007-004591-39. FINDINGS: Between June 26, 2001, and May 8, 2015, of 4271 eligible patients in the 2001 RTSG–SIOP Wilms' tumour database, 538 (13%) relapsed. Median follow-up from surgery was 62 months (IQR 32–93). The method used to detect relapse was registered for 410 (76%) of 538 relapses. Planned surveillance imaging captured 289 (70%) of these 410 relapses. The primary imaging modality used to detect relapse was reported for 251 patients, among which relapse was identified by abdominal ultrasound (80 [32%] patients), chest x-ray (78 [31%]), CT scan of the chest (64 [25%]) or abdomen (20 [8%]), and abdominal MRI (nine [4%]). 279 (68%) of 410 relapses were not detectable by physical examination and 261 (64%) patients did not have clinical symptoms at relapse. The estimated number of scans needed to detect one subclinical relapse during the first 2 years after nephrectomy was 112 (95% CI 106–119) and, for 2–5 years after nephrectomy, 500 (416–588). INTERPRETATION: Planned surveillance imaging captured more than two-thirds of predominantly asymptomatic relapses of Wilms' tumours, with most detected by abdominal ultrasound, chest x-ray, or chest CT scan. Beyond 2 years post-nephrectomy, a substantial number of surveillance scans are needed to capture one relapse, which places a burden on families and health-care systems.

Type: Article
Title: Relapse of Wilms' Tumour and Detection Methods: a Retrospective Analysis of the 2001 Renal Tumour Study Group-international Society of Paediatric Oncology Wilms' Tumour Protocol Database
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30293-6
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30293-6
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > UCL GOS Institute of Child Health
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > UCL GOS Institute of Child Health > Developmental Biology and Cancer Dept
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10059503
Downloads since deposit
111Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item