UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

The labors of justice: democracy, respect, and judicial review

Howard, JW; (2017) The labors of justice: democracy, respect, and judicial review. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy pp. 1-24. 10.1080/13698230.2017.1334437. (In press). Green open access

[thumbnail of Howard_The Labors of Justice - Final Version for CRISPP.pdf]
Preview
Text
Howard_The Labors of Justice - Final Version for CRISPP.pdf - Accepted version

Download (588kB) | Preview

Abstract

Why value democracy? One familiar answer is that democracy expresses respect for citizens, whereas non-democratic modes of governance insultingly express disrespect. Recent work has subjected this view to substantial criticism, raising serious doubts about its plausibility. This article contends that prevailing objections succeed only because they target implausible interpretations of this view, according to which the wrong of political exclusion consists in some insulting disregard for the interests of excluded agents. On the revised respect-based argument to be defended here, however, the insult of political exclusion implicates not the interests of excluded agents, but rather their duties. On this view, democracy is uniquely respectful because it recognizes that the work of achieving a just political order is work that morality assigns not simply to a select few, but to all. To shut moral agents out of the decision-making process is insulting because it flouts their status as the kinds of beings on whom duties of justice equally fall, and who therefore have a presumptively equal prerogative to be involved in seeing to it that justice is done. This interpretation of the respect-based argument is not susceptible to the objections advanced against other interpretations. It better accounts for the role of reasonable disagreement about justice in democratic theory. And it is superior at explaining why respect-based democrats should harbor a qualified skepticism toward judicial review: because the job of securing justice fundamentally belongs not to judges, but to everybody.

Type: Article
Title: The labors of justice: democracy, respect, and judicial review
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1080/13698230.2017.1334437
Publisher version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2017.1334437
Language: English
Additional information: © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
Keywords: Democracy, respect, natural duty of justice, judicial review
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of S&HS
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of S&HS > Dept of Political Science
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10056806
Downloads since deposit
136Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item