UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Acceptability, Accuracy and Safety of Disposable Transnasal Capsule Endoscopy for Barrett’s Esophagus Screening

Sami, SS; Iyer, PG; Pophali, P; Halland, M; di Pietro, M; Ortiz-Fernandez-Sordo, J; White, JR; ... Ragunath, K; + view all (2018) Acceptability, Accuracy and Safety of Disposable Transnasal Capsule Endoscopy for Barrett’s Esophagus Screening. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.07.019. (In press). Green open access

[thumbnail of Sami_Acceptability, Accuracy and Safety of Disposable Transnasal Capsule Endoscopy for Barrett's Esophagus Screening_AAM.pdf]
Preview
Text
Sami_Acceptability, Accuracy and Safety of Disposable Transnasal Capsule Endoscopy for Barrett's Esophagus Screening_AAM.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (3MB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Screening for Barrett's esophagus (BE) with conventional esophagogastroduodenoscopy (C-EGD) is expensive. We assessed the performance of a clinic-based, single use transnasal capsule endoscope (EG Scan II) for the detection of BE, compared to C-EGD as the reference standard. METHODS: We performed a prospective multicenter cohort study of patients with and without BE recruited from 3 referral centers (1 in the United States and 2 in the United Kingdom). Of 200 consenting participants, 178 (89%) completed both procedures (11% failed EG Scan due to the inability to intubate the nasopharynx). The mean age of participants was 57.9 years and 67% were male. The prevalence of BE was 53%. All subjects underwent the 2 procedures on the same day, performed by blinded endoscopists. Patients completed preference and validated tolerability (10-point visual analogue scale [VAS]) questionnaires within 14 days of the procedures. RESULTS: A higher proportion of patients preferred the EG Scan (54.2%) vs the C-EGD (16.7%) (P<.001) and the EG Scan had a higher VAS score (7.2) vs the C-EGD (6.4) (P=.0004). No serious adverse events occurred. The EG Scan identified any length BE with a sensitivity value of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.83-0.96) and a specificity value of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.82-0.96). The EG Scan identified long segment BE with a sensitivity value of 0.95 and short segment BE with a sensitivity values of 0.87. CONCLUSION: In a prospective study, we found the EG Scan to be safe and to detect BE with higher than 90% sensitivity and specificity. A higher proportion of patients preferred the EG Scan to C-EGD. This device might be used as a clinic-based tool to screen populations at risk for BE. ISRCTN registry identifier: 70595405; ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT02066233.

Type: Article
Title: Acceptability, Accuracy and Safety of Disposable Transnasal Capsule Endoscopy for Barrett’s Esophagus Screening
Location: United States
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.07.019
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2018.07.019
Language: English
Additional information: © 2018 by the AGA Institute. This is an Open Access article published under the terms of The Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Keywords: Esophageal adenocarcinoma, imaging, office, portable, reflux
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences > Div of Surgery and Interventional Sci
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10055162
Downloads since deposit
118Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item