Shipworth, D;
Fell, MJ;
Elam, S;
(2018)
Response to “Vulnerability and resistance in the United Kingdom's smart meter transition”.
Energy Policy
10.1016/j.enpol.2018.08.039.
(In press).
Preview |
Text
UCL Correspondance response to EP 1800820_clean.pdf - Accepted Version Download (414kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Sovacool et al. (2017) consider and critique the Smart Metering Implementation Programme (SMIP) in the United Kingdom. In this response we highlight a number of areas where we believe it would have been helpful for readers to see additional information. These relate to three areas: how the authors reported on the methods used in their study; how the Programme is addressing technical challenges; and how the Programme is engaging with people in vulnerable situations. We also point out areas where we see emerging challenges, such as engaging non-traditional stakeholders, and how organizations which want to use smart meter data in the public interest might encounter barriers in meeting the demands of the Smart Energy Code.
Type: | Article |
---|---|
Title: | Response to “Vulnerability and resistance in the United Kingdom's smart meter transition” |
Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.08.039 |
Publisher version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.08.039 |
Language: | English |
Additional information: | This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions. |
UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of the Built Environment UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of the Built Environment > Bartlett School Env, Energy and Resources |
URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10054974 |
Archive Staff Only
View Item |