UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Adding Defibrillation Therapy to Cardiac Resynchronization on the Basis of the Myocardial Substrate

Barra, S; Boveda, S; Providência, R; Sadoul, N; Duehmke, R; Reitan, C; Borgquist, R; ... French-UK-Sweden CRT Network, .; + view all (2017) Adding Defibrillation Therapy to Cardiac Resynchronization on the Basis of the Myocardial Substrate. Journal of the American College of Cardiology , 69 (13) pp. 1669-1678. 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.01.042. Green open access

[thumbnail of Barra_CRTp vs CRTd ARTICLE aetiology JACC revision.pdf]
Preview
Text
Barra_CRTp vs CRTd ARTICLE aetiology JACC revision.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (386kB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) may be at lower risk for ventricular arrhythmias compared with those with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM). In addition, DCM has been identified as a predictor of positive response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of an additional implantable cardioverter-defibrillator over CRT, according to underlying heart disease, in a large study group of primary prevention patients with heart failure. METHODS: This was an observational, multicenter, European cohort study of 5,307 consecutive patients with DCM or ICM, no history of sustained ventricular arrhythmias, who underwent CRT implantation with (n = 4,037) or without (n = 1,270) a defibrillator. Propensity-score and cause-of-death analyses were used to compare outcomes. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up period of 41.4 ± 29.0 months, patients with ICM had better survival when receiving CRT with a defibrillator compared with those who received CRT without a defibrillator (hazard ratio for mortality adjusted on propensity score and all mortality predictors: 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.62 to 0.92; p = 0.005), whereas in patients with DCM, no such difference was observed (hazard ratio: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.73 to 1.16; p = 0.49). Compared with recipients of defibrillators, the excess mortality in patients who did not receive defibrillators was related to sudden cardiac death in 8.0% among those with ICM but in only 0.4% of those with DCM. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with heart failure with indications for CRT, those with DCM may not benefit from additional primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy, as opposed to those with ICM.

Type: Article
Title: Adding Defibrillation Therapy to Cardiac Resynchronization on the Basis of the Myocardial Substrate
Location: United States
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.01.042
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.01.042
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
Keywords: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; cardiac resynchronization therapy; cause of death analysis; sudden cardiac death; all-cause mortality; ischemic cardiomyopathy; coronary artery disease; dilated cardiomyopathy; propensity score matching; propensity score weighting
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute of Health Informatics
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10052007
Downloads since deposit
183Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item