Latifoltojar, A; Punwani, S; Lopes, A; Humphries, PD; Klusmann, M; Menezes, LJ; Daw, S; ... Taylor, SA; + view all Latifoltojar, A; Punwani, S; Lopes, A; Humphries, PD; Klusmann, M; Menezes, LJ; Daw, S; Shankar, A; Neriman, D; Fitzke, H; Clifton-Hadley, L; Smith, P; Taylor, SA; - view fewer (2019) Whole-body MRI for staging and interim response monitoring in paediatric and adolescent Hodgkin's lymphoma: a comparison with multi-modality reference standard including 18F-FDG-PET-CT. European Radiology , 29 (1) pp. 202-212. 10.1007/s00330-018-5445-8.

Preview	Text Clifton-Hadley VoR Latifoltojar2019_Article_Whole-bodyMRIForStagingAndInte.pdf - Published Version Download (3MB) | Preview
Preview	Text (Supplementary file) 330_2018_5445_MOESM1_ESM.pdf Download (573kB) | Preview

Abstract

Objectives: To prospectively investigate concordance between whole-body MRI (WB-MRI) and a composite reference standard for initial staging and interim response evaluation in paediatric and adolescent Hodgkin’s lymphoma. // Methods: Fifty patients (32 male, age range 6–19 years) underwent WB-MRI and standard investigations, including 18F-FDG-PET-CT at diagnosis and following 2–3 chemotherapy cycles. Two radiologists in consensus interpreted WB-MRI using prespecified definitions of disease positivity. A third radiologist reviewed a subset of staging WB-MRIs (n = 38) separately to test for interobserver agreement. A multidisciplinary team derived a primary reference standard using all available imaging/clinical investigations. Subsequently, a second multidisciplinary panel rereviewed all imaging with long-term follow-up data to derive an enhanced reference standard. Interobserver agreement for WB-MRI reads was tested using kappa statistics. Concordance for correct classification of all disease sites, true positive rate (TPR), false positive rate (FPR) and kappa for staging/response agreement were calculated for WB-MRI. // Results: There was discordance for full stage in 74% (95% CI 61.9–83.9%) and 44% (32.0–56.6%) of patients against the primary and enhanced reference standards, respectively. Against the enhanced reference standard, the WB-MRI TPR, FPR and kappa were 91%, 1% and 0.93 (0.90–0.96) for nodal disease and 79%, < 1% and 0.86 (0.77–0.95) for extra-nodal disease. WB-MRI response classification was correct in 25/38 evaluable patients (66%), underestimating response in 26% (kappa 0.30, 95% CI 0.04–0.57). There was a good agreement for nodal (kappa 0.78, 95% CI 0.73–0.84) and extra-nodal staging (kappa 0.60, 95% CI 0.41–0.78) between WB-MRI reads. // Conclusions: WB-MRI has reasonable accuracy for nodal and extra-nodal staging but is discordant with standard imaging in a substantial minority of patients, and tends to underestimate disease response.

Download activity - last month

Export as XMLCSVJSON

Download activity - last 12 months

Export as XMLCSVJSON

Downloads by country - last 12 months

Export as CSVXMLJSON

Archive Staff Only

View Item