Zalabardo, JL;
(2017)
Safety, sensitivity and differential support.
Synthese
10.1007/s11229-017-1645-z.
(In press).
Preview |
Text
10.1007_s11229-017-1645-z.pdf - Published Version Download (392kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The paper argues against Sosa’s claim that sensitivity cannot be differentially supported over safety as the right requirement for knowledge. Its main contention is that, although all sensitive beliefs that should be counted as knowledge are also safe, some insensitive true beliefs that shouldn’t be counted as knowledge are nevertheless safe.
| Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Title: | Safety, sensitivity and differential support |
| Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s11229-017-1645-z |
| Publisher version: | https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1645-z |
| Language: | English |
| Additional information: | Copyright © The Author(s) 2017. Open Access: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
| UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of Arts and Humanities UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of Arts and Humanities > Dept of Philosophy |
| URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10042837 |
Downloads since deposit
Loading...Download activity - last month
Loading...Download activity - last 12 months
Loading...Downloads by country - last 12 months
Loading...Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
