Van IJzendoorn, M;
Fearon, P;
Bakermans-Kranenburg, M;
(2017)
Attachment – public and scientific discourse.
The Psychologist
, 30
pp. 6-9.
Preview |
Text
Fearon_AttachmentDiscourse.pdf - Accepted Version Download (115kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In her rather scathing review of ‘The predictive power of attachment’ (January 2017) Elizabeth Meins takes aim at misguided opinions about attachment that circulate in the policy arena. Certainly, policy makers, in an attempt to secure public money that children, families, and schools badly need, tend to exaggerate claims about the critical importance of early experience. The public discourse however should be sharply differentiated from the scientific discourse. Here we focus on Meins’s critique of attachment research. We list some of her comments about the evidence and show that they are largely mistaken.
| Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Title: | Attachment – public and scientific discourse |
| Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
| Publisher version: | https://thepsychologist.bps.org.uk/volume-30/march... |
| Language: | English |
| Additional information: | This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions. |
| UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences > Clinical, Edu and Hlth Psychology |
| URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10042709 |
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
