UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Estimating the Comparative Effectiveness of Feeding Interventions in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A Demonstration of Longitudinal Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation

Kreif, N; Tran, L; Grieve, R; De Stavola, B; Tasker, RC; Petersen, M; (2017) Estimating the Comparative Effectiveness of Feeding Interventions in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A Demonstration of Longitudinal Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation. American Journal of Epidemiology , 186 (12) pp. 1370-1379. 10.1093/aje/kwx213. Green open access

[thumbnail of Stavola_Estimating the Comparative Effectiveness of Feeding Interventions in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.pdf]
Preview
Text
Stavola_Estimating the Comparative Effectiveness of Feeding Interventions in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.pdf - Published Version

Download (389kB) | Preview

Abstract

Longitudinal data sources offer new opportunities for the evaluation of sequential interventions. To adjust for time-dependent confounding in these settings, longitudinal targeted maximum likelihood based estimation (TMLE), a doubly robust method that can be coupled with machine learning, has been proposed. This paper provides a tutorial in applying longitudinal TMLE, in contrast to inverse probability of treatment weighting and g-computation based on iterative conditional expectations. We apply these methods to estimate the causal effect of nutritional interventions on clinical outcomes among critically ill children in a United Kingdom study (Control of Hyperglycemia in Paediatric Intensive Care, 2008–2011). We estimate the probability of a child’s being discharged alive from the pediatric intensive care unit by a given day, under a range of static and dynamic feeding regimes. We find that before adjustment, patients who follow the static regime “never feed” are discharged by the end of the fifth day with a probability of 0.88 (95% confidence interval: 0.87, 0.90), while for the patients who follow the regime “feed from day 3,” the probability of discharge is 0.64 (95% confidence interval: 0.62, 0.66). After adjustment for time-dependent confounding, most of this difference disappears, and the statistical methods produce similar results. TMLE offers a flexible estimation approach; hence, we provide practical guidance on implementation to encourage its wider use.

Type: Article
Title: Estimating the Comparative Effectiveness of Feeding Interventions in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A Demonstration of Longitudinal Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation
Location: United States
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwx213
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwx213
Language: English
Additional information: © The Author(s) 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0).
Keywords: causal inference, epidemiologic methods, longitudinal targeted maximum likelihood estimation, machine learning, Super Learner, time-dependent confounding
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > UCL GOS Institute of Child Health
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > UCL GOS Institute of Child Health > Population, Policy and Practice Dept
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10042347
Downloads since deposit
50Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item