UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

The potential power of experience in communications of expert consensus levels

Harris, AJL; Sildmäe, O; Speekenbrink, M; Hahn, U; (2019) The potential power of experience in communications of expert consensus levels. Journal of Risk Research , 22 (5) pp. 593-609. 10.1080/13669877.2018.1440416. Green open access

[img]
Preview
Text
Harris_sildmae_etAl_2018_JRiskResearch.pdf - Accepted version

Download (551kB) | Preview

Abstract

Understanding the scientific consensus on anthropogenic climate change has been dubbed a ‘gateway belief’ to engaging people in sustainable behaviour. We consider the question of how the impact of a consensus communication can be maximised. Firstly, the credibility of the communicator should be maximised. One way of achieving this is to present the opinions of a sample of scientists directly to individuals. The decision-making literature suggests that such a technique will confer an additional advantage over standard descriptions of consensus (e.g. ‘97% of scientists agree’). In decision-making research, low probabilities tend to be overweighted when probabilities are described, but underweighted when probability information is experienced. Consequently, statements of high consensus may lead to an overweighting of the dissensus, a phenomenon that may be reversed were the consensus to be ‘experienced.’ We obtain some positive support for our proposal that consensus is best ‘experienced’ in one of two experiments. We suggest that the lack of stronger positive support could relate to ceiling effects for the topics studied and propose that investigation of effective methods for ‘experiencing’ the consensus is a fruitful area for future research.

Type: Article
Title: The potential power of experience in communications of expert consensus levels
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2018.1440416
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2018.1440416
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
Keywords: Source credibility, decisions from experience, climate change, testimony
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences > Experimental Psychology
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10042296
Downloads since deposit
0Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item