Ranieri, VF;
Barratt, H;
Rees, G;
Fulop, NJ;
(2018)
A Qualitative Study of the Influences on Clinical Academic Physicians' Postdoctoral Career Decision-Making.
Academic Medicine
, 93
(11)
pp. 1686-1693.
10.1097/ACM.0000000000002141.
Preview |
Text
Ranieri_A_Qualitative_Study_of_the_Influences_on_Clinical.31.pdf - Published Version Download (259kB) | Preview |
Abstract
PURPOSE: To describe the influences on clinical academic physicians' postdoctoral career decision-making. METHOD: Thirty-five doctoral trainee physicians from University College London took part in semi-structured interviews in 2015 and 2016. Participants were asked open-ended questions about their career to-date, their experiences undertaking a PhD, and their career plans post-PhD. The interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Thematic analysis was used to generate, review, and define themes from the transcripts. Emerging differences and similarities in participants' reasons for pursuing a PhD were then grouped to produce typologies to explore how their experiences influenced their career decision-making. RESULTS: Participants described four key reasons for undertaking a PhD, which formed the basis of the four typologies identified. These reasons included: to pursue a clinical academic career; to complete an extensive period of research to understand whether a clinical academic career was the desired path forward; to improve clinical career prospects; and to take a break from clinical training. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the need to target efforts at retaining clinical academic physicians according to their reasons for pursuing a PhD and their subsequent experiences with the process. Those responsible for overseeing clinical training must be well-informed of the long-term benefits of training academically-qualified physicians. In light of current political uncertainty, universities, hospitals, and external agencies alike must increase their efforts to inspire and assuage early-career clinical academic physicians' fears regarding their academic future.This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
