UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Diagnosing cancer in primary care: results from the National Cancer Diagnosis Audit

Swann, R; McPhail, S; Witt, J; Shand, B; Abel, GA; Hiom, S; Rashbass, J; ... National Cancer Diagnosis Audit Steering Group; + view all (2017) Diagnosing cancer in primary care: results from the National Cancer Diagnosis Audit. British Journal of General Practice , 68 (666) e63-e72. 10.3399/bjgp17X694169. Green open access

[thumbnail of Swann et al. Foundation NCDA paper 2017.pdf]
Preview
Text
Swann et al. Foundation NCDA paper 2017.pdf - Published Version
Available under License : See the attached licence file.

Download (145kB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Continual improvements in diagnostic processes are needed to minimise the proportion of patients with cancer who experience diagnostic delays. Clinical audit is a means of achieving this. AIM: To characterise key aspects of the diagnostic process for cancer and to generate baseline measures for future re-audit. DESIGN AND SETTING: Clinical audit of cancer diagnosis in general practices in England. METHOD: Information on patient and tumour characteristics held in the English National Cancer Registry was supplemented by information from GPs in participating practices. Data items included diagnostic timepoints, patient characteristics, and clinical management. RESULTS: Data were collected on 17 042 patients with a new diagnosis of cancer during 2014 from 439 practices. Participating practices were similar to non-participating ones, particularly regarding population age, urban/rural location, and practice-based patient experience measures. The median diagnostic interval for all patients was 40 days (interquartile range [IQR] 15-86 days). Most patients were referred promptly (median primary care interval 5 days [IQR 0-27 days]). Where GPs deemed diagnostic delays to have occurred (22% of cases), patient, clinician, or system factors were responsible in 26%, 28%, and 34% of instances, respectively. Safety netting was recorded for 44% of patients. At least one primary care-led investigation was carried out for 45% of patients. Most patients (76%) had at least one existing comorbid condition; 21% had three or more. CONCLUSION: The findings identify avenues for quality improvement activity and provide a baseline for future audit of the impact of 2015 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance on management and referral of suspected cancer.

Type: Article
Title: Diagnosing cancer in primary care: results from the National Cancer Diagnosis Audit
Location: England
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.3399/bjgp17X694169
Publisher version: http://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp17X694169
Language: English
Additional information: Copyright © British Journal of General Practice. This article is Open Access: CC BY-NC 4.0 licence (http://creativecommons.org/licences/ by-nc/4.0/).
Keywords: cancer, clinical audit, diagnosis, investigations, morbidity, primary care
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute of Epidemiology and Health
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute of Epidemiology and Health > Behavioural Science and Health
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10040744
Downloads since deposit
101Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item