UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Intentional harm, accessories and conspiracies

Davies, PS; Sales, P; (2018) Intentional harm, accessories and conspiracies. The Law Quarterly Review , 134 pp. 69-93. Green open access

[thumbnail of Davies_Conspiracy article - LQR FINAL revised May17 - clean.pdf]
Preview
Text
Davies_Conspiracy article - LQR FINAL revised May17 - clean.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (764kB) | Preview

Abstract

Assesses the principles about conspiracy tort which can be derived from OBG Ltd v Allan (HL), Customs and Excise Commissioners v Total Network SL (HL) and Fish & Fish Ltd v Sea Shepherd UK (SC), including how they clarify its relationship with the tort of intentional infliction of harm by unlawful means and the concept of accessory liability. Suggests why criminal law and economic torts are unhelpful for determining civil liability for conspiracy.

Type: Article
Title: Intentional harm, accessories and conspiracies
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
Publisher version: http://www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/Catalogue/Product...
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
Keywords: Accessories; Causing loss by unlawful means; Conspiracy; Unlawful means conspiracy
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of Laws
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10038445
Downloads since deposit
723Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item