UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Adolescent students' ideas about provisional historical explanation.

Barca Oliveira, Maria Isabel.; (1996) Adolescent students' ideas about provisional historical explanation. Doctoral thesis , Institute of Education, University of London. Green open access

[thumbnail of 149005_Redacted.pdf]
149005_Redacted.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (3MB) | Preview
[thumbnail of 149005_Original.pdf] Text
149005_Original.pdf - Accepted Version
Access restricted to UCL open access staff
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (4MB)


Adolescents' ideas about provisional historical explanation were analysed in a sample of Portuguese 12 to 20 year-old students, attending the 7th, 9th and 1 1 th grade. In the light of a theoretical framework considering three conceptual clusters - explanatory structure, explanatory consistency, and objectivity and truth - students' ideas were categorised in a model of five levels of progression, functioning as the main working hypothesis, and generated through a qualitative analysis. At Level 1 (the story), students' ideas appear mainly related to description. At Level 2 (the right explanation), there is a focus on the correct explanation, explanations are assessed in everyday terms, and the direct observation paradigm tends to be valued. At Level 3 (the more factors the better), students' concerns appear linked to an ideal of aggregation of factors, evidence is discriminated as sources to the explanation, and the "memory paradigm" tends to be valued. At Level 4, (a consensual explanation?), there is a preoccupation about a perspectiveless neutrality, valuing verification and interlinked factors (explanations may take the narrative form). An objectivist trend defends the search for a consensual explanation whilst a relativist view denies its possibility due to existing different perspectives. At Level 5 (perspective), neutrality and perspective are recognised as genuine features of historical explanation, these appearing in conflict with ideas of perspectiveless neutrality. Explanations may take the narrative mode, and an interlink of factors is valued. Explanatory assessment may appear as evidential confirmation and refutation, and reference may be made to the substantive historical context. A statistical analysis of data concerning levels of progression by sex, age and grade, and responses to some specific sub-tasks, was carried out. Differences on sex were not found statistically significant but differences on age and grade appeared significant at the 5% level.

Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Title: Adolescent students' ideas about provisional historical explanation.
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
Language: English
Additional information: Some content has been redacted due to third party rights or other legal issues and is labelled as such in the document.
Keywords: History education,Historiography,Pupil attitudes,Student attitudes,Secondary education,Portugal
UCL classification: UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education > UCL Institute of Education
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10021629
Downloads since deposit
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item