Pelletier, Caroline;
Stevenson, Fiona;
Chrysikou, Vasiliki;
Park, Sophie;
Gibson, William;
(2015)
Reconsidering ‘ethics’ and ‘quality’ in healthcare research: the case for an iterative ethical paradigm.
BMC Health Services Research
![[thumbnail of Draft 5 7docx]](https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text (Draft 5 7docx)
Draft_5_7docx.docx - Submitted Version Access restricted to Registered users only Available under License ["licenses_description_unspecified" not defined]. Download (50kB) | Request a copy |
Abstract
UK-based research conducted within a healthcare setting generally requires approval from the National Research Ethics Service. Research ethics committees are required to assess a vast range of proposals, differing in both their topic and methodology. We argue the methodological benchmarks with which research ethics committees are generally familiar and which form the basis of assessments of quality do not fit with the aims and objectives of many forms of qualitative inquiry and their more iterative goals of describing social processes/mechanisms and making visible the complexities of social practices. We review current debates in the literature related to ethical review and social research, and illustrate the importance of re-visiting the notion of ethics in healthcare research.
| Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Title: | Reconsidering ‘ethics’ and ‘quality’ in healthcare research: the case for an iterative ethical paradigm |
| Language: | English |
| Keywords: | Quality, research ethics committees, health research |
| UCL classification: | UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education > UCL Institute of Education |
| URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10021270 |
Loading...
Loading...Loading...Loading...Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
