eprintid: 1569290
rev_number: 45
eprint_status: archive
userid: 608
dir: disk0/01/56/92/90
datestamp: 2017-08-09 14:36:00
lastmod: 2021-10-03 23:50:34
status_changed: 2017-08-09 14:36:00
type: article
metadata_visibility: show
creators_name: Wheeler, DC
creators_name: Kim, LG
creators_name: Cleary, F
creators_name: Caplin, B
creators_name: Nitsch, D
creators_name: Hull, SA
title: How do primary care doctors in England and Wales code and manage people with chronic kidney disease? Results from the National Chronic Kidney Disease Audit
ispublished: pub
divisions: UCL
divisions: B02
divisions: C10
divisions: D17
divisions: G93
keywords: Audit, Chronic Kidney Disease, Coding, Management, Primary Care
note: Copyright © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERAEDTA.  This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), 
which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
abstract: BACKGROUND:
In the UK, primary care records are electronic and require doctors to ascribe disease codes to direct care plans and facilitate safe prescribing. We investigated factors associated with coding of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients with reduced kidney function and the impact this has on patient management.
METHODS:
We identified patients meeting biochemical criteria for CKD (two estimated glomerular filtration rates <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 taken >90 days apart) from 1039 general practitioner (GP) practices in a UK audit. Clustered logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with coding for CKD and improvement in coding as a result of the audit process. We investigated the relationship between coding and five interventions recommended for CKD: achieving blood pressure targets, proteinuria testing, statin prescription and flu and pneumococcal vaccination.
RESULTS:
Of 256 000 patients with biochemical CKD, 30% did not have a GP CKD code. Males, older patients, those with more severe CKD, diabetes or hypertension or those prescribed statins were more likely to have a CKD code. Among those with continued biochemical CKD following audit, these same characteristics increased the odds of improved coding. Patients without any kidney diagnosis were less likely to receive optimal care than those coded for CKD [e.g. odds ratio for meeting blood pressure target 0.78 (95% confidence interval 0.76–0.79)].
CONCLUSION:
Older age, male sex, diabetes and hypertension are associated with coding for those with biochemical CKD. CKD coding is associated with receiving key primary care interventions recommended for CKD. Increased efforts to incentivize CKD coding may improve outcomes for CKD patients.
date: 2017-10-16
date_type: published
publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
official_url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfx280
oa_status: green
full_text_type: other
language: eng
primo: open
primo_central: open_green
article_type_text: Article
verified: verified_manual
elements_id: 1410499
doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfx280
lyricists_name: Caplin, Benjamin
lyricists_name: Wheeler, David
lyricists_id: BCAPL88
lyricists_id: DWHEE12
actors_name: Dewerpe, Marie
actors_id: MDDEW97
actors_role: owner
full_text_status: public
publication: Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
issn: 0931-0509
citation:        Wheeler, DC;    Kim, LG;    Cleary, F;    Caplin, B;    Nitsch, D;    Hull, SA;      (2017)    How do primary care doctors in England and Wales code and manage people with chronic kidney disease? Results from the National Chronic Kidney Disease Audit.                   Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation        10.1093/ndt/gfx280 <https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt%2Fgfx280>.       Green open access   
 
document_url: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1569290/24/Kim_how_do_primary_care_doctors_in_England.pdf