@article{discovery1525231,
           month = {January},
           pages = {122--140},
         journal = {Bilingualism},
            note = {This article has been published in a revised form in Bilingualism: Language and Cognition https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728914000832. This version is free to view and download for private research and study only. Not for re-distribution, re-sale or use in derivative works. {\copyright} 2014 Cambridge University Press.},
          volume = {19},
            year = {2016},
           title = {Flawed self-assessment: Investigating self-and other-perception of second language speech},
          number = {1},
            issn = {1469-1841},
          author = {Trofimovich, P and Isaacs, T and Kennedy, S and Saito, K and Crowther, D},
             url = {https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728914000832},
        abstract = {This study targeted the relationship between self-and other-assessment of accentedness and comprehensibility in second language (L2) speech, extending prior social and cognitive research documenting weak or non-existing links between people's self-assessment and objective measures of performance. Results of two experiments (N = 134) revealed mostly inaccurate self-assessment: speakers at the low end of the accentedness and comprehensibility scales overestimated their performance; speakers at the high end of each scale underestimated it. For both accent and comprehensibility, discrepancies in self-versus other-assessment were associated with listener-rated measures of phonological accuracy and temporal fluency but not with listener-rated measures of lexical appropriateness and richness, grammatical accuracy and complexity, or discourse structure. Findings suggest that inaccurate self-assessment is linked to the inherent complexity of L2 perception and production as cognitive skills and point to several ways of helping L2 speakers align or calibrate their self-assessment with their actual performance.}
}