eprintid: 1508556 rev_number: 23 eprint_status: archive userid: 608 dir: disk0/01/50/85/56 datestamp: 2016-11-29 15:02:38 lastmod: 2020-02-13 07:40:03 status_changed: 2016-11-29 15:02:38 type: article metadata_visibility: show creators_name: Clark, IA creators_name: MacKay, CE creators_name: Holmes, EA creators_name: Bourne, C title: Letter to the Editor: A reply – acknowledged reasonable limitations in a secondary analysis but key conclusions remain in ‘The neural basis of flashback formation: the impact of viewing trauma’ ispublished: pub divisions: UCL divisions: A01 divisions: B02 divisions: C07 divisions: D07 divisions: F83 keywords: Social Sciences, Science & Technology, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Psychology, Clinical, Psychiatry, Psychology, Posttraumatic-Stress-Disorder, intrusive memories, film paradigm, footage, metaanalysis, recall note: © Cambridge University Press 2016. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. date: 2016-06 date_type: published publisher: CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS official_url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291716000052 oa_status: green full_text_type: pub language: eng primo: open primo_central: open_green article_type_text: Letter verified: verified_manual elements_id: 1153598 doi: 10.1017/S0033291716000052 language_elements: English lyricists_name: Clark, Ian lyricists_id: IACLA53 actors_name: Clark, Ian actors_id: IACLA53 actors_role: owner full_text_status: public publication: Psychological Medicine volume: 46 number: 8 pagerange: 1787-1789 pages: 3 issn: 0033-2917 citation: Clark, IA; MacKay, CE; Holmes, EA; Bourne, C; (2016) Letter to the Editor: A reply – acknowledged reasonable limitations in a secondary analysis but key conclusions remain in ‘The neural basis of flashback formation: the impact of viewing trauma’. Psychological Medicine , 46 (8) pp. 1787-1789. 10.1017/S0033291716000052 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291716000052>. Green open access document_url: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1508556/1/Clark_Response%20to%20Mole%2C%20Psychological%20Medicine.pdf