eprintid: 1483871
rev_number: 30
eprint_status: archive
userid: 608
dir: disk0/01/48/38/71
datestamp: 2016-04-24 07:15:34
lastmod: 2021-07-16 22:56:05
status_changed: 2018-10-18 09:33:50
type: article
metadata_visibility: show
creators_name: Alderson, P
creators_name: Goodey, C
title: Theories of consent
ispublished: pub
divisions: UCL
divisions: A01
divisions: B16
divisions: B14
divisions: J81
note: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
abstract: Consent is understood differently by various disciplines
and professions, and also in various theoretical
models.1 In this article we review the advantages and
limitations of theories about real consent, constructed
consent, functionalist and critical consent, and
postmodern choice. The article shows how an analysis
of theories can clarify practical knowledge about the
advantages of and problems in obtaining consent,
which will help everyday practice and research.
date: 1998-11-07
date_type: published
official_url: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.317.7168.1313
oa_status: green
full_text_type: other
pmcid: PMC1114211
language: eng
primo: open
primo_central: open_green
verified: verified_manual
elements_id: 1106515
doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7168.1313
lyricists_name: Alderson, Priscilla
lyricists_id: DPALD60
full_text_status: public
publication: BMJ
volume: 317
number: 7168
pagerange: 1313-1315
event_location: England
issn: 0959-8138
citation:        Alderson, P;    Goodey, C;      (1998)    Theories of consent.                   BMJ , 317  (7168)   pp. 1313-1315.    10.1136/bmj.317.7168.1313 <https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.317.7168.1313>.       Green open access   
 
document_url: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1483871/1/Alderson_Theories%20of%20consent%201998.pdf