%0 Journal Article
%@ 1369-8486
%A Clarke, B
%D 2014
%F discovery:1447059
%I Elsevier
%J Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences
%K Burkitt lymphoma, big science, cancer viruses, geographical pathology, long safari, maps
%P 210-217
%T Mapping the methodologies of Burkitt lymphoma
%U https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1447059/
%V 48
%X While recent accounts have emphasised the planned, large-scale and systematic character of cancer virus research in the mid-C20, I argue here that a distinctive kind of small-scale scientific research existed, and made a distinctive contribution to the development of the field as a whole. Using the case of the research carried out to understand the causes of Burkitt lymphoma in Africa during the 1960s, I highlight two distinctive practices – geographical mapping and the re-purposing of existing disease infrastructure – that played a central role in this episode. My intention here is threefold: first, I will argue that this research is unlike the research practices usually identified as typical ‘big science’ research concerning cancer viruses, particularly in the United States. Second, I will argue that this kind of research is also clearly distinct from the kind of research that Derek Price (Price 1963) characterised as ‘little science’. Thirdly, I will sketch a positive characterisation of this kind of research as ‘small science’. I conclude by suggesting that this characterisation may be applied to other kinds of historical biomedical research, and that so doing may offer the pluralist a useful alternative way of understanding medical research in the twentieth century.
%Z © 2014 The Author. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-SA  license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/).