eprintid: 1367283
rev_number: 35
eprint_status: archive
userid: 608
dir: disk0/01/36/72/83
datestamp: 2012-10-12 18:58:48
lastmod: 2020-02-13 01:20:08
status_changed: 2012-12-05 12:29:57
type: article
metadata_visibility: show
item_issues_count: 0
creators_name: Horne, R
creators_name: Petrie, KJ
creators_name: Wessely, S
title: H-index pathology: Implications for medical researchers and practitioners
ispublished: pub
divisions: UCL
divisions: A01
divisions: B02
divisions: C08
divisions: D10
divisions: G11
note: © BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2009
abstract: The h-index has quickly become the standard method by which medical schools judge the impact of medical researchers. Rob Horne, Keith Petrie, and Simon Wessely describe a cluster of potentially pathological behaviours associated with the index.
date: 2009-12
official_url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b5356
vfaculties: VFLS
oa_status: green
language: eng
primo: open
primo_central: open_green
verified: verified_manual
elements_source: Scopus
elements_id: 420268
doi: 10.1136/bmj.b5356
lyricists_name: Horne, Robert
lyricists_id: RHORN95
full_text_status: public
publication: BMJ (Online)
volume: 339
number: 7735
article_number: b5356
issn: 1756-1833
citation:        Horne, R;    Petrie, KJ;    Wessely, S;      (2009)    H-index pathology: Implications for medical researchers and practitioners.                   BMJ (Online) , 339  (7735)    , Article b5356.  10.1136/bmj.b5356 <https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b5356>.       Green open access   
 
document_url: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1367283/1/1.pdf