TY  - UNPB
N1  - Copyright © The Author 2025. Original content in this thesis is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) Licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Any third-party copyright material present remains the property of its respective owner(s) and is licensed under its existing terms. Access may initially be restricted at the author?s request.
EP  - 283
Y1  - 2025/01/28/
AV  - restricted
TI  - The Politics of the Future in Britain, 1940-1979
A1  - Hill, Alexander
M1  - Doctoral
PB  - UCL (University College London)
UR  - https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10203550/
ID  - discovery10203550
N2  - In this thesis, I ask how ?ordinary? people made sense of the future between 1940 and 1979. I analyse a wide range of sources?Mass-Observation directives responses, transcripts from social science research and radio interviews, and children?s essays?to uncover the vernacular discourses people used to orient themselves towards change. I argue that many people considered their own personal futures to be projects, determined by their own choices. However, they found it increasingly difficult to project a collective future. I argue that two narratives of a collective future?one populist, and one meritocratic?had dominated vernacular politics in the 1940s and 1950s, but by the beginning of the 1960s people expressed profound doubts about ?progress? and a collective future.
	I begin by studying directive respondents in the Mass Observation Archive across the 1940s. I chart the rise and fall of a populist narrative of ?the future?, one which was ?hoping against hope? for the triumph of ?the people?. In Chapter Two, I explore archived social science material to argue that a vision of a meritocratic future dominated the vernacular politics of the 1950s: here, it was imagined that class hierarchies were being replaced thanks to affluence, education, and expertise. In Chapter Three, I explore archived radio interview transcripts and social science interviews, children?s essays, and documentaries, arguing that by the early 1960s a growing number of doubts surfaced about collective ?progress?. In Chapter Four, I look at archived transcripts from radio interviews and essays from school leavers to explore the growth of new forms of individualism in the 1970s. I argue that a core part of these new forms of individualism was a widening of the horizon of personal futures. Finally, in Chapter Five, I explore how the vernacular politics of race fed off the collapse of these collective futures.
ER  -