eprintid: 10197302
rev_number: 6
eprint_status: archive
userid: 699
dir: disk0/10/19/73/02
datestamp: 2024-10-14 11:03:03
lastmod: 2024-10-14 11:03:03
status_changed: 2024-10-14 11:03:03
type: article
metadata_visibility: show
sword_depositor: 699
creators_name: Vandenberg, Laura N
creators_name: Agerstrand, Marlene
creators_name: Beronius, Anna
creators_name: Beausoleil, Claire
creators_name: Bergman, Ake
creators_name: Bero, Lisa A
creators_name: Bornehag, Carl-Gustaf
creators_name: Boyer, C Scott
creators_name: Cooper, Glinda S
creators_name: Cotgreave, Ian
creators_name: Gee, David
creators_name: Grandjean, Philippe
creators_name: Guyton, Kathryn Z
creators_name: Hass, Ulla
creators_name: Heindel, Jerrold J
creators_name: Jobling, Susan
creators_name: Kidd, Karen A
creators_name: Kortenkamp, Andreas
creators_name: Macleod, Malcolm R
creators_name: Martin, Olwenn V
creators_name: Norinder, Ulf
creators_name: Scheringer, Martin
creators_name: Thayer, Kristina A
creators_name: Toppari, Jorma
creators_name: Whaley, Paul
creators_name: Woodruff, Tracey J
creators_name: Ruden, Christina
title: A proposed framework for the systematic review and integrated assessment (SYRINA) of endocrine disrupting chemicals
ispublished: pub
divisions: UCL
divisions: B03
divisions: C01
divisions: K22
keywords: Endocrine disrupting chemicals, Systematic review, Study evaluation, Strength of evidence, Weight of evidence, Adverse effect, Endocrine disrupting activity, Evidence integration
Epidemiology, In vivo
note: © The Author(s), 2016.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
abstract: Background:
The issue of endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) is receiving wide attention from both the scientific and regulatory communities. Recent analyses of the EDC literature have been criticized for failing to use transparent and objective approaches to draw conclusions about the strength of evidence linking EDC exposures to adverse health or environmental outcomes. Systematic review methodologies are ideal for addressing this issue as they provide transparent and consistent approaches to study selection and evaluation. Objective methods are needed for integrating the multiple streams of evidence (epidemiology, wildlife, laboratory animal, in vitro, and in silico data) that are relevant in assessing EDCs.//

Methods:
We have developed a framework for the systematic review and integrated assessment (SYRINA) of EDC studies. The framework was designed for use with the International Program on Chemical Safety (IPCS) and World Health Organization (WHO) definition of an EDC, which requires appraisal of evidence regarding 1) association between exposure and an adverse effect, 2) association between exposure and endocrine disrupting activity, and 3) a plausible link between the adverse effect and the endocrine disrupting activity.//

Results:
Building from existing methodologies for evaluating and synthesizing evidence, the SYRINA framework includes seven steps: 1) Formulate the problem; 2) Develop the review protocol; 3) Identify relevant evidence; 4) Evaluate evidence from individual studies; 5) Summarize and evaluate each stream of evidence; 6) Integrate evidence across all streams; 7) Draw conclusions, make recommendations, and evaluate uncertainties. The proposed method is tailored to the IPCS/WHO definition of an EDC but offers flexibility for use in the context of other definitions of EDCs.//

Conclusions:
When using the SYRINA framework, the overall objective is to provide the evidence base needed to support decision making, including any action to avoid/minimise potential adverse effects of exposures. This framework allows for the evaluation and synthesis of evidence from multiple evidence streams. Finally, a decision regarding regulatory action is not only dependent on the strength of evidence, but also the consequences of action/inaction, e.g. limited or weak evidence may be sufficient to justify action if consequences are serious or irreversible.//
date: 2016-07-14
date_type: published
publisher: BMC
official_url: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-016-0156-6
oa_status: green
full_text_type: pub
language: eng
primo: open
primo_central: open_green
verified: verified_manual
elements_id: 1947046
doi: 10.1186/s12940-016-0156-6
medium: Electronic
pii: 10.1186/s12940-016-0156-6
lyricists_name: Martin, Olwenn
lyricists_id: OMART84
actors_name: Martin, Olwenn
actors_id: OMART84
actors_role: owner
funding_acknowledgements: [Swedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research "Mistra"]; K22ES025811 [National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences of the National Institutes of Health]; A123547 [Clarence Heller Foundation]; [Passport Foundation]; [Forsythia Foundation]; ES018135 [National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences]; ESO22841 [National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences]; RD83467801 [U.S. EPA STAR grants]; RD83543301 [U.S. EPA STAR grants]; [Academy of Finland]; [Sigrid Juselius]; [Danish EPA]; 950-230607 [Canada Research Chairs program]; NC/L000970/1 [National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs)]; ceh010010 [Natural Environment Research Council]
full_text_status: public
publication: Environmental Health
volume: 15
article_number: 74
pages: 19
event_location: England
issn: 1476-069X
citation:        Vandenberg, Laura N;    Agerstrand, Marlene;    Beronius, Anna;    Beausoleil, Claire;    Bergman, Ake;    Bero, Lisa A;    Bornehag, Carl-Gustaf;                                                                                 ... Ruden, Christina; + view all <#>        Vandenberg, Laura N;  Agerstrand, Marlene;  Beronius, Anna;  Beausoleil, Claire;  Bergman, Ake;  Bero, Lisa A;  Bornehag, Carl-Gustaf;  Boyer, C Scott;  Cooper, Glinda S;  Cotgreave, Ian;  Gee, David;  Grandjean, Philippe;  Guyton, Kathryn Z;  Hass, Ulla;  Heindel, Jerrold J;  Jobling, Susan;  Kidd, Karen A;  Kortenkamp, Andreas;  Macleod, Malcolm R;  Martin, Olwenn V;  Norinder, Ulf;  Scheringer, Martin;  Thayer, Kristina A;  Toppari, Jorma;  Whaley, Paul;  Woodruff, Tracey J;  Ruden, Christina;   - view fewer <#>    (2016)    A proposed framework for the systematic review and integrated assessment (SYRINA) of endocrine disrupting chemicals.                   Environmental Health , 15     , Article 74.  10.1186/s12940-016-0156-6 <https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-016-0156-6>.       Green open access   
 
document_url: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10197302/1/A%20proposed%20framework%20for%20the%20systematic%20review%20and%20integrated%20assessment%20%28SYRINA%29%20of%20endocrine%20disrupting%20chemicals.pdf