@article{discovery10195160,
            year = {2023},
           month = {August},
          number = {7975},
           title = {Diverse values of nature for sustainability},
           pages = {813--823},
          volume = {620},
            note = {Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.},
       publisher = {Springer Science and Business Media LLC},
         journal = {Nature},
            issn = {0028-0836},
             url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06406-9},
          author = {Pascual, Unai and Balvanera, Patricia and Anderson, Christopher B and Chaplin-Kramer, Rebecca and Christie, Michael and Gonz{\'a}lez-Jim{\'e}nez, David and Martin, Adrian and Raymond, Christopher M and Termansen, Mette and Vatn, Arild and Athayde, Simone and Baptiste, Brigitte and Barton, David N and Jacobs, Sander and Kelemen, Eszter and Kumar, Ritesh and Lazos, Elena and Mwampamba, Tuyeni H and Nakangu, Barbara and O'Farrell, Patrick and Subramanian, Suneetha M and van Noordwijk, Meine and Ahn, SoEun and Amaruzaman, Sacha and Amin, Ariane M and Arias-Ar{\'e}valo, Paola and Arroyo-Robles, Gabriela and Cant{\'u}-Fern{\'a}ndez, Mariana and Castro, Antonio J and Contreras, Victoria and De Vos, Alta and Dendoncker, Nicolas and Engel, Stefanie and Eser, Uta and Faith, Daniel P and Filyushkina, Anna and Ghazi, Houda and G{\'o}mez-Baggethun, Erik and Gould, Rachelle K and Guibrunet, Louise and Gundimeda, Haripriya and Hahn, Thomas and Harm{\'a}{\vc}kov{\'a}, Zuzana V and Hern{\'a}ndez-Blanco, Marcello and Horcea-Milcu, Andra-Ioana and Huambachano, Mariaelena and Wicher, Natalia Lutti Hummel and Ayd{\i}n, Cem {\.I}skender and Islar, Mine and Koessler, Ann-Kathrin and Kenter, Jasper O and Kosmus, Marina and Lee, Heera and Leimona, Beria and Lele, Sharachchandra and Lenzi, Dominic and Lliso, Bosco and Mannetti, Lelani M and Mer{\cc}on, Juliana and Monroy-Sais, Ana Sof{\'i}a and Mukherjee, Nibedita and Muraca, Barbara and Muradian, Roldan and Murali, Ranjini and Nelson, Sara H and Nemog{\'a}-Soto, Gabriel R and Ngouhouo-Poufoun, Jonas and Niamir, Aidin and Nuesiri, Emmanuel and Nyumba, Tobias O and {\"O}zkaynak, Beg{\"u}m and Palomo, Ignacio and Pandit, Ram and Paw{\l}owska-Mainville, Agnieszka and Porter-Bolland, Luciana and Quaas, Martin and Rode, Julian and Rozzi, Ricardo and Sachdeva, Sonya and Samakov, Aibek and Schaafsma, Marije and Sitas, Nadia and Ungar, Paula and Yiu, Evonne and Yoshida, Yuki and Zent, Eglee},
        abstract = {Twenty-five years since foundational publications on valuing ecosystem services for human well-being1,2, addressing the global biodiversity crisis3 still implies confronting barriers to incorporating nature's diverse values into decision-making. These barriers include powerful interests supported by current norms and legal rules�such as property rights, which determine whose values and which values of nature are acted on. A better understanding of how and why nature is (under)valued is more urgent than ever4. Notwithstanding agreements to incorporate nature's values into actions, including the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF)5 and the UN Sustainable Development Goals6, predominant environmental and development policies still prioritize a subset of values, particularly those linked to markets, and ignore other ways people relate to and benefit from nature7. Arguably, a 'values crisis' underpins the intertwined crises of biodiversity loss and climate change8, pandemic emergence9 and socio-environmental injustices10. On the basis of more than 50,000 scientific publications, policy documents and Indigenous and local knowledge sources, the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) assessed knowledge on nature's diverse values and valuation methods to gain insights into their role in policymaking and fuller integration into decisions7,11. Applying this evidence, combinations of values-centred approaches are proposed to improve valuation and address barriers to uptake, ultimately leveraging transformative changes towards more just (that is, fair treatment of people and nature, including inter- and intragenerational equity) and sustainable futures.}
}