@incollection{discovery10189719, volume = {8}, month = {April}, publisher = {Springer Nature}, booktitle = {Science, Religion, the Humanities and Hope: Essays in Honour of Willem B. Drees}, editor = {Anne Runehov and Michael Fuller}, address = {Cham, Switzerland}, year = {2024}, title = {Willem Drees and the Varieties of Naturalism}, note = {This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher's terms and conditions.}, pages = {73--83}, abstract = {In several of his works, Willem Drees has engaged with many varieties of naturalism. In this chapter I review his own preferred variety, which he most recently labelled 'science-inspired naturalism', linking it back to some of his earlier works and mapping it to an overview of the varieties of naturalism and the 'transcendental naturalism' that I have recently advocated in dialogue with William James, Heinrich Rickert and Bruno Latour. Drees distinguishes between 'science-inspired naturalism', 'philosophical naturalism' and 'religious naturalism'. He argues for science-inspired naturalism and sees philosophical naturalism and religious naturalism as optional choices which are not necessarily implicated by science-inspired naturalism. I assess his claims on naturalism and science, naturalism and philosophy and naturalism and religion. I conclude that his work is compatible with my variety: transcendental naturalism. This means that science must be taken seriously, philosophy must as much as possible refrain from metaphysics and religion must take metaphysics on faith without resorting to supernaturalism.}, url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52292-5\%5f6}, author = {Petersen, Arthur} }