@incollection{discovery10189719,
          volume = {8},
           month = {April},
       publisher = {Springer Nature},
       booktitle = {Science, Religion, the Humanities and Hope: Essays in Honour of Willem B. Drees},
          editor = {Anne Runehov and Michael Fuller},
         address = {Cham, Switzerland},
            year = {2024},
           title = {Willem Drees and the Varieties of Naturalism},
            note = {This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher's terms and conditions.},
           pages = {73--83},
        abstract = {In several of his works, Willem Drees has engaged with many varieties of naturalism. In this chapter I review his own preferred variety, which he most recently labelled 'science-inspired naturalism', linking it back to some of his earlier works and mapping it to an overview of the varieties of naturalism and the 'transcendental naturalism' that I have recently advocated in dialogue with William James, Heinrich Rickert and Bruno Latour. Drees distinguishes between 'science-inspired naturalism', 'philosophical naturalism' and 'religious naturalism'. He argues for science-inspired naturalism and sees philosophical naturalism and religious naturalism as optional choices which are not necessarily implicated by science-inspired naturalism. I assess his claims on naturalism and science, naturalism and philosophy and naturalism and religion. I conclude that his work is compatible with my variety: transcendental naturalism. This means that science must be taken seriously, philosophy must as much as possible refrain from metaphysics and religion must take metaphysics on faith without resorting to supernaturalism.},
             url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52292-5\%5f6},
          author = {Petersen, Arthur}
}