eprintid: 10178910
rev_number: 16
eprint_status: archive
userid: 699
dir: disk0/10/17/89/10
datestamp: 2023-10-16 09:04:38
lastmod: 2024-10-13 06:10:05
status_changed: 2023-10-16 09:04:38
type: article
metadata_visibility: show
sword_depositor: 699
creators_name: Morris, Tim P
creators_name: White, Ian R
creators_name: Cro, Suzie
creators_name: Bartlett, Jonathan W
creators_name: Carpenter, James R
creators_name: Pham, Tra My
title: Comment on Oberman & Vink: Should we fix or simulate the complete data in simulation studies evaluating missing data methods?
ispublished: pub
divisions: UCL
divisions: B02
divisions: D65
divisions: J38
note: This version is the author-accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
abstract: For simulation studies that evaluate methods of handling missing data, we argue that generating partially observed data by fixing the complete data and repeatedly simulating the missingness indicators is a superficially attractive idea but only rarely appropriate to use.
date: 2024-01
date_type: published
publisher: Wiley
official_url: https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.202300085
oa_status: green
full_text_type: other
language: eng
primo: open
primo_central: open_green
verified: verified_manual
elements_id: 2096301
doi: 10.1002/bimj.202300085
lyricists_name: Morris, Timothy
lyricists_id: TNMOR17
actors_name: Morris, Timothy
actors_id: TNMOR17
actors_role: owner
full_text_status: public
publication: Biometrical Journal
volume: 66
number: 1
article_number: 2300085
issn: 0323-3847
citation:        Morris, Tim P;    White, Ian R;    Cro, Suzie;    Bartlett, Jonathan W;    Carpenter, James R;    Pham, Tra My;      (2024)    Comment on Oberman & Vink: Should we fix or simulate the complete data in simulation studies evaluating missing data methods?                   Biometrical Journal , 66  (1)    , Article 2300085.  10.1002/bimj.202300085 <https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.202300085>.       Green open access   
 
document_url: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10178910/1/Oberman_Vink_letter_ACCEPTED.pdf