eprintid: 10178845
rev_number: 7
eprint_status: archive
userid: 699
dir: disk0/10/17/88/45
datestamp: 2023-10-13 14:36:53
lastmod: 2023-10-13 14:36:53
status_changed: 2023-10-13 14:36:53
type: article
metadata_visibility: show
sword_depositor: 699
creators_name: Ginatempo, Francesca
creators_name: Loi, Nicola
creators_name: Manca, Andrea
creators_name: Rothwell, John C
creators_name: Deriu, Franca
title: Is it possible to compare inhibitory and excitatory intracortical circuits in face and hand primary motor cortex?
ispublished: pub
divisions: UCL
divisions: B02
divisions: C07
divisions: D07
divisions: F84
keywords: Face muscles; face primary motor cortex; hand primary motor cortex; intracortical facilitation; intracortical inhibition; TMS
note: Copyright © 2022 The Authors. The Journal of Physiology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Physiological Society.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
abstract: Face muscles are important in a variety of different functions, such as feeding, speech and communication of non-verbal affective states, which require quite different patterns of activity from those of a typical hand muscle. We ask whether there are differences in their neurophysiological control that might reflect this. Fifteen healthy individuals were studied. Standard single- and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) methods were used to compare intracortical inhibitory (short interval intracortical inhibition (SICI); cortical silent period (CSP)) and excitatory circuitries (short interval intracortical facilitation (SICF)) in two typical muscles, the depressor anguli oris (DAO), a face muscle, and the first dorsal interosseous (FDI), a hand muscle. TMS threshold was higher in DAO than in FDI. Over a range of intensities, resting SICF was not different between DAO and FDI, while during muscle activation SICF was stronger in FDI than in DAO (P = 0.012). At rest, SICI was stronger in FDI than in DAO (P = 0.038) but during muscle contraction, SICI was weaker in FDI than in DAO (P = 0.034). We argue that although many of the difference in response to the TMS protocols could result from the difference in thresholds, some, such as the reduction of resting SICI in DAO, may reflect fundamental differences in the physiology of the two muscle groups.
date: 2022-08-01
date_type: published
publisher: WILEY
official_url: https://doi.org/10.1113/JP283137
oa_status: green
full_text_type: pub
language: eng
primo: open
primo_central: open_green
verified: verified_manual
elements_id: 1965831
doi: 10.1113/JP283137
medium: Print-Electronic
lyricists_name: Rothwell, John
lyricists_id: JCROT52
actors_name: Rothwell, John
actors_id: JCROT52
actors_role: owner
funding_acknowledgements: [Banco di Sardegna Foundation]; [Fondo di Ateneo per la Ricerca (FAR)]; [PhD grant in Biomedical Sciences]
full_text_status: public
publication: The Journal of Physiology
volume: 600
number: 15
pagerange: 3567-3583
pages: 17
event_location: England
issn: 0022-3751
citation:        Ginatempo, Francesca;    Loi, Nicola;    Manca, Andrea;    Rothwell, John C;    Deriu, Franca;      (2022)    Is it possible to compare inhibitory and excitatory intracortical circuits in face and hand primary motor cortex?                   The Journal of Physiology , 600  (15)   pp. 3567-3583.    10.1113/JP283137 <https://doi.org/10.1113/JP283137>.       Green open access   
 
document_url: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10178845/1/Is%20it%20possible%20to%20compare%20inhibitory%20and%20excitatory%20intracortical%20circuits%20in%20face%20and%20hand%20primary%20motor%20cortex.pdf