eprintid: 10132525
rev_number: 18
eprint_status: archive
userid: 608
dir: disk0/10/13/25/25
datestamp: 2021-08-09 17:01:09
lastmod: 2022-09-09 15:57:28
status_changed: 2021-08-09 17:01:09
type: article
metadata_visibility: show
creators_name: Papatheodoridi, M
creators_name: Pinzani, M
creators_name: Tsochatzis, E
title: Reply to: "Do we need to re-define the Baveno VI elastography criteria for compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD)?"
ispublished: pub
subjects: RFH
divisions: UCL
divisions: B02
divisions: C10
divisions: D17
divisions: G91
note: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
date: 2021-09
date_type: published
official_url: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2021.06.007
oa_status: green
full_text_type: other
language: eng
primo: open
primo_central: open_green
verified: verified_manual
elements_id: 1872882
doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.06.007
pii: S0168-8278(21)00422-0
lyricists_name: Pinzani, Massimo
lyricists_name: Tsochatzis, Emmanouil
lyricists_id: MPINZ74
lyricists_id: ETSOC40
actors_name: Tsochatzis, Emmanouil
actors_id: ETSOC40
actors_role: owner
full_text_status: public
publication: Journal of Hepatology
volume: 75
number: 3
pagerange: 752-753
event_location: Netherlands
citation:        Papatheodoridi, M;    Pinzani, M;    Tsochatzis, E;      (2021)    Reply to: "Do we need to re-define the Baveno VI elastography criteria for compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD)?".                   Journal of Hepatology , 75  (3)   pp. 752-753.    10.1016/j.jhep.2021.06.007 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2021.06.007>.       Green open access   
 
document_url: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10132525/1/Baveno%20VI%20response%20letter%20to%20Genesca%20J%20Hepatol%202021.pdf