eprintid: 10090651
rev_number: 17
eprint_status: archive
userid: 608
dir: disk0/10/09/06/51
datestamp: 2020-01-29 10:14:40
lastmod: 2021-09-17 22:55:22
status_changed: 2020-01-29 10:14:40
type: article
metadata_visibility: show
creators_name: Mehrabi, A
creators_name: Mazzoni, A
creators_name: Jones, D
creators_name: Steed, A
title: Evaluating the user experience of acoustic data transmission A study of sharing data between mobile devices using sound
ispublished: pub
divisions: UCL
divisions: B04
divisions: C05
divisions: F48
keywords: Acoustic data transmission · Mobile · User experience · Wireless data transfer · Audio · Peer-to-peer connectivity
note: This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
abstract: Users of smart devices frequently need to exchange data with people nearby to them. Yet despite the availability of various communication methods, data exchange between co-located devices is often complicated by technical and user experience barriers. A potential solution to these issues is the emerging technology of device-to-device acoustic data transmission. In this work, we investigate the medium-specific properties of sound as a data exchange mechanism, and question how these contribute to the user experience of sharing data. We present a user study comparing three wireless communication technologies (acoustic data transmission, QR codes and Bluetooth), when used for a common and familiar scenario: peer-to-peer sharing of contact information. Overall, the results show that acoustic data transmission provides a rapid means of transferring data (mean transaction time of 2.4 s), in contrast to Bluetooth (8.3 s) and QR (6.3 s), whilst requiring minimal physical effort and user coordination. All QR code transactions were successful on the first attempt; however, some acoustic (5.6%) and Bluetooth (16.7%) transactions required multiple attempts to successfully share a contact. Participants also provided feedback on their user experience via surveys and semi-structured interviews. Perceived transaction time, physical effort, and connectivity issues. Specifically, users expressed frustration with Bluetooth due to device selection issues, and with QR for the physical coordination required to scan codes. The findings indicate that acoustic data transmission has unique advantages in facilitating information sharing and interaction between co-located users.
date: 2019-12-26
date_type: published
publisher: SPRINGER LONDON LTD
official_url: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-019-01345-7
oa_status: green
full_text_type: pub
language: eng
primo: open
primo_central: open_green
verified: verified_manual
elements_id: 1742123
doi: 10.1007/s00779-019-01345-7
lyricists_name: Steed, Anthony
lyricists_id: ASTEE91
actors_name: Austen, Jennifer
actors_id: JAUST66
actors_role: owner
full_text_status: public
publication: Personal and Ubiquitous Computing
pages: 14
citation:        Mehrabi, A;    Mazzoni, A;    Jones, D;    Steed, A;      (2019)    Evaluating the user experience of acoustic data transmission A study of sharing data between mobile devices using sound.                   Personal and Ubiquitous Computing        10.1007/s00779-019-01345-7 <https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-019-01345-7>.       Green open access   
 
document_url: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10090651/1/Mehrabi2019_Article_EvaluatingTheUserExperienceOfA.pdf