eprintid: 10076889 rev_number: 21 eprint_status: archive userid: 608 dir: disk0/10/07/68/89 datestamp: 2019-08-08 15:30:39 lastmod: 2020-07-01 06:11:04 status_changed: 2019-08-08 15:30:39 type: thesis metadata_visibility: show creators_name: Robin, Enora title: The Politics of Urban Expertise ispublished: unpub divisions: UCL divisions: A01 divisions: B03 divisions: C03 divisions: F26 note: Copyright © The Author 2019. Original content in this thesis is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Any third-party copyright material present remains the property of its respective owner(s) and is licensed under its existing terms. Access may initially be restricted at the author’s request. abstract: This doctoral research investigates the politics of urban expertise in the context of urban redevelopment schemes in Cape Town and London. Paying attention to the politics of scientific techniques and experts in particular sites, this research engages with contemporary urban scholarship looking at the role of expertise in the production of urban space and the politicisation of experts’ activities. The analysis presented here introduces three analytical concepts that intend to capture the relationship between politics, expertise and spatial transformations, namely the concepts of abstraction, performance and maintenance. These three concepts form the theoretical backbone of the comparative analysis presented in this thesis, which looks at two urban redevelopment projects: King’s Cross Central in London, and the Fringe in Cape Town. The empirical examination of the two cases reveals that the socio-technical conditions underpinning the production of urban expertise in both projects support the dominance of techno-financial expertise in the design of spatial interventions. This hegemony is supported by the institutionalisation of financial and economic valuation techniques as key instruments to assess the quality and credibility of the visions behind urban projects. Paradoxically, the research findings also shed light on the relative marginalisation of individual technical experts, whose ability to meaningfully influence the design of redevelopment projects is constrained by project timeframes and resource allocations. The extent to which the status quo can be resisted is also explored, as this research unpacks the mechanics of counter-expertise and discusses community groups’ capacity to subvert dominant modes of expertise production and to generate alternatives to techno-financial expertise. date: 2019-06-28 date_type: published oa_status: green full_text_type: other thesis_class: doctoral_open thesis_award: Ph.D language: eng thesis_view: UCL_Thesis primo: open primo_central: open_green verified: verified_manual elements_id: 1667663 lyricists_name: Robin, Enora lyricists_id: ROBIN66 actors_name: Robin, Enora actors_id: ROBIN66 actors_role: owner full_text_status: public pages: 321 event_title: UCL institution: UCL (University College London) department: Science, Technology, Engineering and Public Policy thesis_type: Doctoral citation: Robin, Enora; (2019) The Politics of Urban Expertise. Doctoral thesis (Ph.D), UCL (University College London). Green open access document_url: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10076889/1/The%20Politics%20of%20Urban%20Expertise-FINAL.pdf