%O This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
%J Energy Research and Social Science
%A G Powells
%A M Fell
%L discovery10071036
%I Elsevier
%X Flexibility has increasing value across sectors of the economy, including energy. The ability
to be flexible is affected by a wide variety of sociotechnical factors and determines what we
term ‘flexibility capital’. Levels of flexibility capital vary in populations, both absolutely and in
the extent to which they are primarily derived from technological or social means, which has
implications for the (dis)comfort and (in)convenience involved in economising flexibility
capital. Furthermore, we argue that freedom of choice over whether and how to economise
flexibility capital can be limited by factors such as financial resources, among others. In
constrained systems (such as energy networks), the level of service enjoyed by the more
affluent may not simply be higher than those who are less affluent, but may be directly
enabled by reductions in the latter’s comfort and/or convenience which may not feel fully
voluntary. There is a real risk that such injustices could be locked into energy infrastructure
and market design and governance for the long term as has already happened in labour
markets. We introduce the concept of ‘flexibility justice’ as a frame for these issues of
fairness. While the concepts we offer in the paper emerge from longstanding engagements
with energy research contexts and they relate directly to the issues currently being debated
in the energy research and policy communities, we contend that they can be related to a
much broader range of issues in 21st century economies.
%T Flexibility Capital and Flexibility Justice in Smart Energy Systems
%K energy, flexibility, capital, justice
%D 2019
%P 56-59
%V 54