eprintid: 10061683
rev_number: 19
eprint_status: archive
userid: 608
dir: disk0/10/06/16/83
datestamp: 2018-11-16 14:41:44
lastmod: 2021-09-19 23:38:45
status_changed: 2018-11-16 14:41:44
type: article
metadata_visibility: show
creators_name: Haubenberger, D
creators_name: Abbruzzese, G
creators_name: Bain, PG
creators_name: Bajaj, N
creators_name: Benito-León, J
creators_name: Bhatia, KP
creators_name: Deuschl, G
creators_name: Forjaz, MJ
creators_name: Hallett, M
creators_name: Louis, ED
creators_name: Lyons, KE
creators_name: Mestre, TA
creators_name: Raethjen, J
creators_name: Stamelou, M
creators_name: Tan, E-K
creators_name: Testa, CM
creators_name: Elble, RJ
title: Transducer-based evaluation of tremor
ispublished: pub
divisions: UCL
divisions: B02
divisions: C07
divisions: D07
divisions: F84
divisions: F85
keywords: tremor, transducers, accelerometry, electromyography, reproducibility of results
note: This version is the version of record. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
abstract: The International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society established a task force on tremor that reviewed the use of transducer‐based measures in the quantification and characterization of tremor. Studies of accelerometry, electromyography, activity monitoring, gyroscopy, digitizing tablet‐based measures, vocal acoustic analysis, and several other transducer‐based methods were identified by searching PubMed.gov. The availability, use, acceptability, reliability, validity, and responsiveness were reviewed for each measure using the following criteria: (1) used in the assessment of tremor; (2) used in published studies by people other than the developers; and (3) adequate clinimetric testing. Accelerometry, gyroscopy, electromyography, and digitizing tablet‐based measures fulfilled all three criteria. Compared to rating scales, transducers are far more sensitive to changes in tremor amplitude and frequency, but they do not appear to be more capable of detecting a change that exceeds random variability in tremor amplitude (minimum detectable change). The use of transducer‐based measures requires careful attention to their limitations and validity in a particular clinical or research setting.
date: 2016-09
date_type: published
publisher: WILEY
official_url: https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.26671
full_text_type: other
language: eng
verified: verified_manual
elements_id: 1137589
doi: 10.1002/mds.26671
lyricists_name: Bhatia, Kailash
lyricists_name: Stamelou, Maria
lyricists_id: KPBHA96
lyricists_id: MSTAM90
actors_name: Wood, Nicholas
actors_name: Allington-Smith, Dominic
actors_id: NWWOO43
actors_id: DAALL44
actors_role: owner
actors_role: impersonator
full_text_status: restricted
publication: Movement Disorders
volume: 31
number: 9
pagerange: 1327-1336
pages: 10
issn: 1531-8257
citation:        Haubenberger, D;    Abbruzzese, G;    Bain, PG;    Bajaj, N;    Benito-León, J;    Bhatia, KP;    Deuschl, G;                                         ... Elble, RJ; + view all <#>        Haubenberger, D;  Abbruzzese, G;  Bain, PG;  Bajaj, N;  Benito-León, J;  Bhatia, KP;  Deuschl, G;  Forjaz, MJ;  Hallett, M;  Louis, ED;  Lyons, KE;  Mestre, TA;  Raethjen, J;  Stamelou, M;  Tan, E-K;  Testa, CM;  Elble, RJ;   - view fewer <#>    (2016)    Transducer-based evaluation of tremor.                   Movement Disorders , 31  (9)   pp. 1327-1336.    10.1002/mds.26671 <https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.26671>.      
 
document_url: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10061683/1/Bhatia_Haubenberger_et_al-2016-Movement_Disorders.pdf