eprintid: 10042837
rev_number: 24
eprint_status: archive
userid: 608
dir: disk0/10/04/28/37
datestamp: 2018-02-07 17:37:23
lastmod: 2021-10-09 23:10:41
status_changed: 2018-02-07 17:37:23
type: article
metadata_visibility: show
creators_name: Zalabardo, JL
title: Safety, sensitivity and differential support
ispublished: inpress
divisions: UCL
divisions: B03
divisions: C01
divisions: F16
note: Copyright © The Author(s) 2017. Open Access: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
abstract: The paper argues against Sosa’s claim that sensitivity cannot be differentially supported over safety as the right requirement for knowledge. Its main contention is that, although all sensitive beliefs that should be counted as knowledge are also safe, some insensitive true beliefs that shouldn’t be counted as knowledge are nevertheless safe.
date: 2017-12-02
date_type: published
official_url: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1645-z
oa_status: green
full_text_type: pub
language: eng
primo: open
primo_central: open_green
article_type_text: Article
verified: verified_manual
elements_id: 1514364
doi: 10.1007/s11229-017-1645-z
lyricists_name: Zalabardo, Jose
lyricists_id: JZALA52
actors_name: Sharp, Catherine
actors_id: CLSHA04
actors_role: owner
full_text_status: public
publication: Synthese
issn: 1573-0964
citation:        Zalabardo, JL;      (2017)    Safety, sensitivity and differential support.                   Synthese        10.1007/s11229-017-1645-z <https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1645-z>.    (In press).    Green open access   
 
document_url: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10042837/1/10.1007_s11229-017-1645-z.pdf