Hill, DL; Smith, AD; Simmons, A; Maurer, CR; Cox, TC; Elwes, R; ... Polkey, CE; + view all Hill, DL; Smith, AD; Simmons, A; Maurer, CR; Cox, TC; Elwes, R; Brammer, M; Hawkes, DJ; Polkey, CE; - view fewer (2000) Sources of error in comparing functional magnetic resonance imaging and invasive electrophysiological recordings. J Neurosurg , 93 (2) 214 - 223. 10.3171/jns.2000.93.2.0214.
Full text not available from this repository.
Several authors have recently reported studies in which they aim to validate functional magnetic resonance (fMR) imaging against the accepted gold standard of invasive electrophysiological monitoring. The authors have conducted a similar study, and in this paper they identify and quantify two characteristics of these data that can make such a comparison problematic.
|Title:||Sources of error in comparing functional magnetic resonance imaging and invasive electrophysiological recordings.|
|Keywords:||Cerebral Cortex, Electroencephalography, Electrophysiology, Epilepsy, Hand, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Motor Cortex, Movement, Reproducibility of Results|
|UCL classification:||UCL > School of BEAMS > Faculty of Engineering Science > Medical Physics and Bioengineering|
Archive Staff Only: edit this record