UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Bovine Tuberculosis and Badger Culling in England: A Utilitarian Analysis of Policy Options

McCulloch, SP; Reiss, MJ; (2017) Bovine Tuberculosis and Badger Culling in England: A Utilitarian Analysis of Policy Options. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 10.1007/s10806-017-9680-9. (In press). Green open access

[thumbnail of McCulloch & Reiss 2017 JAGE Bovine TB and badgers - Utilitarian analysis.pdf]
Preview
Text
McCulloch & Reiss 2017 JAGE Bovine TB and badgers - Utilitarian analysis.pdf - Published Version

Download (521kB) | Preview

Abstract

Bovine tuberculosis (bovine TB) is an important animal health policy issue in Britain, which impacts farmers, the public, domestic farmed cattle and the wild badger population. The Westminster government’s badger culling policy in England, which began in 2013, has caused considerable controversy. This is in part because the Independent Scientific Group advised against culling, based on the Randomised Badger Culling Trial. Those opposed to badger culling support more stringent cattle-based measures and the vaccination of badgers. This paper argues for ethical analysis of public policy options which impact sentient species. It provides a summary Animal Welfare Impact Assessment of (1) a do-nothing approach, (2) badger culling, and (3) badger vaccination. A utilitarian analysis is then applied to these policy options considering human wellbeing and animal welfare. The analysis compares a badger culling policy that achieves a 19% reduction in bovine TB incidence, a badger vaccination model achieving a 12.5% reduction, and a do-nothing approach. Policy options are assessed over 9 years and a longer timeframe, and uncertainty is considered. The analysis finds that non-culling approaches, particularly badger vaccination, result in greater total utility, compared to badger culling. Badger culling causes 30% reduction in the badger population in England as well as substantial harms due to the culling process. Culling is opposed by public opinion and is associated with considerable risks and uncertainty. In contrast, non-culling approaches, such as cattle-based measures and badger vaccination, are supported by public opinion and are not associated with such risks.

Type: Article
Title: Bovine Tuberculosis and Badger Culling in England: A Utilitarian Analysis of Policy Options
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1007/s10806-017-9680-9
Publisher version: http://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-017-9680-9
Language: English
Additional information: © The Author(s) 2017. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Keywords: Animal Welfare Impact Assessment (AWIA); Badger culling; Badger vaccination; Bovine tuberculosis; Government policy; Utilitarianism
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education > UCL Institute of Education
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education > UCL Institute of Education > IOE - Curriculum, Pedagogy and Assessment
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1571908
Downloads since deposit
472Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item