UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

One size doesn't fit all: time to revisit patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in paediatric ophthalmology?

Tadic, V; Rahi, JS; Child Vision PROMs Group, .; (2017) One size doesn't fit all: time to revisit patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in paediatric ophthalmology? Eye , 31 (4) pp. 511-518. 10.1038/eye.2016.316. Green open access

[thumbnail of Tadic_One size doesn't fit all AAM.pdf]
Preview
Text
Tadic_One size doesn't fit all AAM.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (150kB) | Preview

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to summarise methodological challenges and opportunities in the development and application of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for the rare and complex population of children with visually impairing disorders. Following a literature review on development and application of PROMs in children in general, including those with disabilities and or/chronic condition, we identified and discuss here 5 key issues that are specific to children with visual impairment: (1) the conflation between theoretically distinct vision-related constructs and outcomes, (2) the importance of developmentally appropriate approaches to design and application of PROMs, (3) feasibility of standard questionnaire formats and administration for children with different levels of visual impairment, (4) feasibility and nature of self-reporting by visually impaired children, and (5) epidemiological, statistical and ethical considerations. There is an established need for vision-specific age-appropriate PROMs for use in paediatric ophthalmology, but there are significant practical and methodological challenges in developing and applying appropriate measures. Further understanding of the characteristics and needs of visually impaired children as questionnaire respondents is necessary for development of quality PROMs and their meaningful application in clinical practice and research.

Type: Article
Title: One size doesn't fit all: time to revisit patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in paediatric ophthalmology?
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1038/eye.2016.316
Publisher version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/eye.2016.316
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > UCL GOS Institute of Child Health
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > UCL GOS Institute of Child Health > Population, Policy and Practice Dept
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1536101
Downloads since deposit
166Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item