UCL logo

UCL Discovery

UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Resulting trusts and unjust enrichment: three controversies

Penner, J; (2010) Resulting trusts and unjust enrichment: three controversies. In: Mitchell,, (ed.) Constructive and Resulting Trusts. (? - ?). Hart Pub

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

It is controversial what needs to be proved in order to benefit from the presumption of resulting trusts, whether all resulting trusts arise by operation of law, and whether resulting trusts are restitutionary or not. The author shows that a claimant need not prove an absence of consideration before benefitting from the presumption, and argues that, whilst presumed resulting trusts respond to intention, they arise by operation of law. Finally, the author argues that one argument for a restitutionary analysis of resulting trusts, i.e. that a transferor cannot retain a beneficial interest in property title to which he has transferred, is misconceived.

Type:Book chapter
Title:Resulting trusts and unjust enrichment: three controversies
ISBN:1841139270
ISBN-13:9781841139272
Keywords:Law, philosophy of property, unjust enrichment, property, restitution, tracing, unjust enrichment
UCL classification:UCL > School of Arts and Social Sciences > Faculty of Laws

Archive Staff Only: edit this record