Coid, JW;
Bhui, K;
MacManus, D;
Kallis, C;
Bebbington, P;
Ullrich, S;
(2016)
Extremism, religion and psychiatric morbidity in a population-based sample of young men.
British Journal of Psychiatry
, 209
(6)
pp. 491-497.
10.1192/bjp.bp.116.186510.
Preview |
Text
Coid extremism BJPsych 2016.pdf - Published Version Download (523kB) | Preview |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is growing risk from terrorism following radicalisation of young men. It is unclear whether psychopathology is associated. AIMS: To investigate the population distribution of extremist views among UK men. METHOD: Cross-sectional study of 3679 men, 18-34 years, in Great Britain. Multivariate analyses of attitudes, psychiatric morbidity, ethnicity and religion. RESULTS: Pro-British men were more likely to be White, UK born, not religious; anti-British were Muslim, religious, of Pakistani origin, from deprived areas. Pro- and anti-British views were linearly associated with violence (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 1.51, 95% CI 1.38-1.64, P<0.001, adjusted OR = 1.33, 95% CI 1.13-1.58, P<0.001, respectively) and negatively with depression (adjusted OR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.61-0.85, P<0.001, adjusted OR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.48-0.86, P = 0.003, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Men at risk of depression may experience protection from strong cultural or religious identity. Antisocial behaviour increases with extremism. Religion is protective but may determine targets of violence following radicalisation.
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
