UCL logo

UCL Discovery

UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Fundamentally Objectionable?

Rogers, J; (2007) Fundamentally Objectionable? New Law Journal , 157 (7288) 1252 - 1253.

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

I argued that the decision in R v J was fundamentally flawed because their Lordships had not considered that an arbitrary time limit which prevents meritorious prosecutions for underage sexual intercourse may violate Article 8 ECHR. I suggested that this should be one rare case where their Lordships ought to reverse one of their own decisions.

Type:Article
Title:Fundamentally Objectionable?
Additional information:cited with approval in the Criminal Law Review
Keywords:time limit, underage sexual intercourse, R v J, Article 8 ECHR
UCL classification:UCL > School of Arts and Social Sciences > Faculty of Laws

Archive Staff Only: edit this record