Sharp, C; Fowler, C; Salas, R; Nielsen, D; Allen, J; Oldham, J; Kosten, T; ... Fonagy, P; + view all Sharp, C; Fowler, C; Salas, R; Nielsen, D; Allen, J; Oldham, J; Kosten, T; Matthew, S; Madan, A; Frueh, BC; Fonagy, P; - view fewer (2016) Operationalizing NIMH Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) in naturalistic clinical settings. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic , 80 (3) pp. 187-212. 10.1521/bumc.2016.80.3.187.

Preview

Text Sharp et al 02016 Operationalizing NIMH Research Domain Criteria.pdf Download (540kB) | Preview

Abstract

Recently, the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) introduced the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) initiative to address two major challenges facing the field of psychiatry: (1) the lack of new effective personalized treatments for psychiatric disorders, and (2) the limitations associated with categorically-defined psychiatric disorders. While the potential of RDoC to revolutionize personalized psychiatric medicine and psychiatric nosology has been acknowledged, it is unclear how to implement RDoC in naturalistic clinical settings as part of routine outcomes research. In this paper we present the major RDoC principles and then show how these principles are operationalized in the Menninger Clinic’s McNair Initiative for Neuroscience Discovery-Menninger & Baylor College of Medicine (MIND-MB) study. We discuss how RDoC-informed outcomes-based assessment in clinical settings can transform personalized clinical care through multimodal treatments.

Download activity - last month

Export as XMLCSVJSON

Download activity - last 12 months

Export as XMLCSVJSON

Downloads by country - last 12 months

Export as CSVXMLJSON

Archive Staff Only

View Item