Hobart, JC and Williams, LS and Moran, K and Thompson, AJ (2002) Quality of life measurement after stroke - Uses and abuses of the SF-36. STROKE , 33 (5) 1348 - 1356. 10.1161/01.STR.0000015030.59594.B3.
Full text not available from this repository.
Background and Purpose-The Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) is widely used to measure health status after stroke. However, a fundamental assumption for its valid use after stroke has not been comprehensively tested: is it legitimate to generate scores for 8 scales and 2 summary measures using the standard algorithms? We tested this assumption.Methods-SF-36 data from 177 people after stroke were examined (71% male; mean age, 62). We tested 6 scaling criteria to determine the legitimacy of generating the 8 SF-36 scale scores using Likert's method of summed ratings, and we tested 2 scaling criteria to determine the appropriateness of the standard SF-36 algorithms for weighting and combining scale scores to generate 2 summary measures (physical and mental).Results-Scaling assumption, were fully satisfied for 6 of the 8 scales, but 3 of these 6 scales had notable floor and/or ceiling effects. Assumptions for generating 2 SF-36 summary measures were not satisfied.Conclusions-In this sample, 5 of the 8 SF-36 scales had limited validity as outcome measures after stroke, and the reporting of physical and mental summary scores was not supported. Results raise questions about the use of the SF-36 in stroke, and the SF-12 that is developed from it, and highlight the importance of testing scaling assumptions when applying existing scales to new populations.
|Title:||Quality of life measurement after stroke - Uses and abuses of the SF-36|
|Keywords:||health measurement, psychometrics, quality of life, SF-36, stroke outcome, FORM HEALTH SURVEY, MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS, SCALING ASSUMPTIONS, SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE, PARKINSONS-DISEASE, SCORE RELIABILITY, OUTCOME MEASURE, TESTS, VALIDATION, VALIDITY|
|UCL classification:||UCL > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences|
Archive Staff Only: edit this record