Spiegler, R. (2006) On two points of view regarding revealed preferences and behavioral economics. (ELSE Working Papers 223). ESRC Centre for Economic Learning and Social Evolution: London, UK.
![[img]](/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png)
| PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader 186Kb |
Abstract
Non-standard decision models are often inconsistent with a narrow version of the revealed preference principle, according to which 'utility maximization and observed choice are synonymous'. One possible response to this state of a¤airs is that the revealed preference principle is irrelevant if it conflicts with a model in which the theorist puts a lot of faith thanks to psychological evidence. Another response is that the narrow version of the principle should be retained and used as a criterion for evaluating decision models. I discuss these two points of view, using as a template two well-known classes of decision models. The first point of view is examined in light of a class of models in which the decision maker's subjective belief is a carrier of utility. The second point of view is discussed in the context of Gul and Pesendorfer's model of self-control preferences.
| Type: | Working / discussion paper |
|---|---|
| Title: | On two points of view regarding revealed preferences and behavioral economics |
| Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
| Publisher version: | http://else.econ.ucl.ac.uk/newweb/papers.php#2006 |
| Language: | English |
| UCL classification: | UCL > School of Arts and Social Sciences > Faculty of Social and Historical Sciences > Economics |
View download statistics for this itemArchive Staff Only: edit this record